In the book The White Power, written by Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founder, Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) and published in 2014, students are categorized into seven tiers.
Medical students belong to the first tier, followed by engineering (second), business school (third), law school (fourth), agriculture (fifth), and humanities and the social sciences (sixth). Students at art schools are not included at all. Perhaps they are considered the seventh tier.
What can we make of Ko’s classification? Is it one based on an IQ of 157 or an EQ of zero? Everyone can reach their own conclusions on this. Let us take a look at US society. Born with different talents, people are encouraged to choose whatever they take up. Those attracted to movies major in film studies. Tech-savvy people attend programs such as electrical engineering, computer science, or big data, anything related to science, technology, engineering and math. Those interested in literature study the subject, and those who find medical science intriguing can attend medical schools. This applies to other countries as well. Students are encouraged to choose wisely.
As mighty as whales are, they cannot climb up a tree and live there. At the same time, monkeys are born with excellent tree climbing skills, but they cannot swim like the whale does in the Pacific Ocean. No one has ever classified students into different tiers based on what they choose to study. Every trade has its master, and there are many ways to attain fame. This is common sense. It is not rocket science.
According to Ko’s viewpoint and classification, former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), an agricultural studies graduate and Taiwan’s president for 12 years, belongs to the fifth tier. Former presidents Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), as well as President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), all attended law schools. Should they be considered fourth-tier presidents? Former US president Donald Trump studied business and US President Joe Biden studied law. Are they third-tier and fourth-tier figures?
According to Ko’s standard, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is not worth mentioning. Are Nvidia Corp cofounder and CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) and Advanced Micro Devices Inc chief executive officer Lisa Su (蘇姿丰), both of whom visited Taiwan recently and caused a sensation, as well as Microsoft Corp co-founder Bill Gates and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) second-tier figures? Director Ang Lee (李安) and actor Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) and many Academy Award winners, according to Ko’s ridiculous standard, are in the lowest league.
Chuang Sheng-rong is a lawyer.
Translated by Emma Liu
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS