Tom Cruise’s latest Mission Impossible film has jumped on the artificial intelligence (AI) bandwagon, breaking the pattern of the evil antagonist being either an ambitious human or a malevolent alien species. The new antagonist is none other than an all-powerful AI known as the “Entity.”
Mission: Impossible — Dead Reckoning Part One depicts how the world’s superpowers race to find a cruciform key that unlocks answers to an incredibly powerful, omniscient and cognitive AI entity. Only Ethan Hunt, played by Cruise, and his crew want to destroy it, knowing such a powerful weapon would bring unimaginable disaster upon humanity if it falls into the wrong hands.
The film highlights “four fears” that a “perfect” AI would bring to the human world.
First is the fear that information has become less secure. In the age of the Internet and social media, most people have given up on ensuring the privacy of their personal information. In the age of AI, even if you are not an active information technology (IT) user, your personal information is still at risk of being breached.
Humans have always dreamed of inventing a robot that is capable of self-growth, possesses cognitive skills like humans and has the ability to process abstract problems, so as to help people make judgements, forecasts and solve problems. Recent AI developments have brought humanity a step closer to this dream.
For example, AI technologies have increased the accuracy of diagnosis and treatment of neuronal tumors, thereby improving predictions of recurrence and survival rates. Studies have shown that their diagnoses were at times more accurate than those made by doctors.
Additionally, AI is capable of finding other treatments and healthcare solutions, offering a better price-performance ratio. AI software such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Midjourney are designed for easy use by ordinary users to enhance their accessibility.
The AI antagonist in the Mission Impossible film is able to hack into systems connected to the Internet, acquire all the information it needs, and use the information and technologies to put everything under its control.
We are now living in the time of AI, but we have no way to prevent such malicious attacks. What we can do is to back up critical information in case of breaches, take everything with a pinch of salt and be mentally prepared for the damage caused by the loss of information.
Second is the fear of surveillance. In the film, IT agents, government officials and the Entity rely on facial recognition technology and dead reckoning to find and track targets. Surveillance that could occur anytime, anywhere could undermine people’s privacy and exacerbate people’s fear of AI.
Third is the fear of simulacra. To alleviate consumer unease, companies use anthropomorphism to humanize their products or services. For example, Pepper the robot is equipped with eyes, a mouth and limbs. Many ChatBots have human-like appearances, voices, gender and names. These humanoid characteristics and measures are adopted to reduce people’s fear of the unknown.
In the film, the director uses swooshing graphics and eye-like optics to personify the Entity, so that it would not appear too human-like to invoke the uncanny valley effect. However, people should still remember that this is a trick to alleviate their fear and, therefore, aversion to AI. The Entity still has great computing power up its sleeve, and could be more cunning and calculating than imaginable.
Finally, AI could replace humans. The movie vaguely tells the audience that a powerful, omniscient and cognitive AI can replace humans and possibly annihilate them one day. The AI can make efficient decisions autonomously just like any human being, and with the help of followers, complete its task, and even replace and destroy humans eventually.
This is not the first Hollywood movie to touch upon the subject of the dark side of AI, and media reports have lately focused on how many jobs AI would be replacing. The film has not only portrayed AI in a negative light, but also demonstrated that AI has no sense of morality and does not bear any responsibility for its actions.
Such concerns are why the EU and the international community have proposed a legal framework to govern AI, aiming to address the risks generated by specific uses of the technology. But is this possible? Once the rules are set in place, they would run counter to the ideal of developing an AI that can think, act and interact with humans.
We will have to wait for the conclusion to the story arc to know if Cruise’s character can save the day and whether humans can keep AI under control.
Lee Ya-ching is a professor at National Sun Yat-sen University’s Institute of Marketing Communication.
Translated by Rita Wang
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS