For more than a month, the Chinese Communist Party’s media and commentators have been trying to propagandize the “undecided status of Okinawa islands.” Such propaganda has reached its peak since Okinawa Prefecture Governor Denny Tamaki’s high-profile visit to China early this month. Beijing is indirectly warning Tokyo.
China is once again playing the “Ryukyu card” for various reasons, among which its fear of Japan and the US deploying land-based medium-range guided missiles in the Okinawa islands is perhaps its biggest worry.
The intention of the Chinese propaganda became even more evident after Tamaki arrived in China on July 3. The governor is a known pro-China advocate. His one-week trip was meticulously stage-managed by Beijing. Three things are worth noting.
First, on July 3, Tamaki said in an interview with the Global Times that Okinawa should not be reduced to a battlefield due to “a Taiwan emergency is a Japan emergency,” approach. Second, on July 4, he paid his respects at the Ryukyu Kingdom cemetery in Beijing. Last, he traveled on July 6 to China’s Fujian Province, where he visited another Ryukyu Kingdom cemetery in Fuzhou, which is home to Ryukyu crew members and students who died in Fuzhou during the Ming and Qing dynasties. He also visited the Ryukyu Pavilion, a center of ancient Ryukyu officials who were sent to China to pay tributes.
These arrangements, including the stance taken and the strengthening of historical links between China and the Ryukyu Kingdom, are obvious to the Taiwanese, because China has adopted similar tactics against Taiwan.
China is playing the “Ryukyu card” for many reasons, but one point has not yet been discussed. By going back in time to last year, a clue appears. July 8 last year, China first revealed the news through the Global Times that the Japanese military would assist the US to deploy medium-range guided missile troops to the Okinawa islands. On July 28, the Chinese Ministry of National Defense responded that if the deployment is implemented, China would firmly counteract it, warning that Japan and the US should not have any illusions about this.
Following then-US House of Representatives speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan in August last year, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) launched large-scale military exercises in the waters surrounding Taiwan. On Aug. 4, the first day of the drills, five missiles landed in Japan’s exclusive economic zone, immediately resulting in strong condemnation and protest from Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s administration. Beijing’s move also proved former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe’s claim that “a Taiwan emergency is a Japanese emergency,” while virtually legitimizing the deployment of missiles in Okinawa Prefecture to deter a Chinese invasion into Japanese territory.
Regardless of whether China’s surprise missile landing was intentional, Beijing must have known the impact of the incident. By linking this to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) political show at the new China National Archives of Publications and Culture last month, and the visit of a pro-China delegation led by former Japanese House speaker Yohei Kono, along with Tamaki, it is reasonable to assume that this is a result of China’s fear of US missile deployment in Japan, and part of Beijing’s countermeasure to shake up and break through the situation.
After all, from China’s existing military containment in the first island chain, if Japan and the US were to add a medium-range guided missile base to choke off access to the Miyako Strait, how much would that deter China?
Tzou Jiing-wen is editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times (the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times).
Translated by Eddy Chang
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then