Radioactively contaminated water is soon to be discharged from Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant into the Pacific Ocean after being treated by an Advanced Liquid Processing System (ALPS). This decision has drawn protests from neighboring countries as the water contains radioactive tritium.
Tritium is a hydrogen isotope that also occurs in nature because it is produced when cosmic rays collide with air molecules in the atmosphere. Tritiated water has chemical features almost identical to water with an ordinary hydrogen atom. Tritium has a radioactive half-life of 12.32 years. Tritiated water has a relatively short half-life of about 10 days in the human body. Tritium emits weak beta particles, which are electrons and cannot penetrate the human body through the skin. A Canadian study showed that tritium is not associated with an increased risk of cancer for people who live near nuclear power stations.
Nuclear power plants around the world release low concentrations of tritium into the environment. In China, Japan, Taiwan and South Korea, they emit more than 1,400 trillion becquerels (Bq) of tritium radioactivity each year, but the tritium radioactivity in the water of the western part of the north Pacific Ocean remains below 0.3 becquerels per liter (Bq/l), which is within the range of natural background radiation.
The tritium radioactivity of water discharged from the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant between March and June 2011 as an emergency measure following the March 11, 2011, nuclear accident was about 3,400 trillion becquerels, but none of it was detected in Taiwan.
The radioactivity of tritium-containing water discharged into the sea by the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant would be kept below 1,500Bq/l, which is far less than Japan’s tritium discharge standard of 60,000Bq/l and the WHO’s limit of 10,000Bq/l. After being diluted by rapidly mixing it with a huge amount of seawater, the radioactivity of the discharged water would very soon be the same as that of the surrounding background level.
The average amount of liquid tritium discharged by the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County over the past decade was 35.8 trillion becquerels per year, which is 1.6 times higher than the 22 trillion becquerels of tritium that is to be discharged annually from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant. Nonetheless, the results of environmental impact assessments carried out over the years show that it is hard to detect any tritium in South Bay (南灣), which is adjacent to the Ma-anshan plant.
Japanese models of the planned discharge show that the human exposure radiation dose from discharging the tritium would be a mere 1/100,000 of the average annual radiation dose of 2.1 millisierverts that people in Japan receive from the natural environment. This is a negligible amount, so the discharges of tritium-containing wastewater would hardly pose any risk to marine organisms or humans.
The International Atomic Energy Agency in 2021 set up a task force comprising 11 internationally recognized experts from the UK, the US, Canada and several other countries. They independently examined the radiological characteristics of water treated at the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant, and monitored the environment. This work is done openly and transparently, and it is to continue for the foreseeable future.
Taiwanese should act according to the scientific evidence, rather than mimick the opposition of some Japanese fishers or governments such as China and South Korea. Imagine, if China, South Korea or Taiwan needed to carry out such discharges. Would it be right for neighboring countries to protest without the support of scientific evidence?
Lin Ji-shing is a university professor.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking