Encouraged by the latest #MeToo movement, many alledged victims of sexual harassment have come forward to make accusations, in politics, academia and the workplace. As a result, civil groups have called to amend laws what would require employers to establish transparent, reliable reporting channels, and fulfill their duty to prevent sexual harassment.
According to reports, 80 percent of sexual harassment victims are afraid to file a complaint, especially when offenders are supervisors or have status and power, and there are no third-party witnesses in most cases. Filing a complaint might be not only difficult but also painful, which might not harm offenders, but harm the victims. Establishing a broad and non-threatening complaint system and environment should be the focus of legislative changes.
First, people’s awareness of gender equality should be heightened. Through laws, it should become mandatory for schools at all levels to provide many hours of gender equality education. At work, job training for new employees must include gender equality awareness programs, too, equipping people with general and legal knowledge of gender equality, increase gender equality awareness and reduce sexual harassment cases.
Second, reporting channels should be built with protective systems that sexual harassment victims trust. As sexual harassment often occurs at the victims’ workplace, where supervisors control gender equality committees, it would be diffucult for such a committee to win their trust.
Therefore, an independent committee with members from outside the unit should first be to established. The next step should be to ensure those responsible for receiving complaints are mental health and law experts. Empathy and support and a non-threatening complaint system are more useful than “educating” victims to “bravely” report their sexual harassment cases.
Lin Jin-jia is an attending psychiatrist at Chi Mei Medical Center in Tainan.
Translated by Eddy Chang
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
RSS