The US Indo-Pacific Command said that a Chinese warship cut across the path of a US destroyer and a Canadian Navy frigate doing a routine transit in the Taiwan Strait on June 3.
China’s ship, a guided-missile destroyer, crossed the bow of the USS Chung-Hoon at 137m, forcing the US vessel to slow its course to “avoid collision.”
The incident came on the heels of a Chinese fighter jet on May 26 flying in front of the nose of a US Air Force RC-135 aircraft conducting routine operations over the hotly contested South China Sea, which the US Indo-Pacific Command condemned as an “unnecessarily aggressive maneuver” in the air. Details regarding the two close encounters by the US and Canada were revealed to warn the international community of China’s “unsafe and unprofessional” maneuvers.
However, the two partners would continue with their routine patrols in the Indo-Pacific in accordance with the freedom of navigation as international law stipulates. As defense ministers and military officials around the globe convened in Singapore for the Shangri-La Dialogue, it is worth investigating the reasons behind China’s escalating provocations.
US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and Chinese Minister of National Defense Li Shangfu (李尚福) were at the annual defense conference. Li’s words at the forum suggested that the US and its allies had created the danger with their patrols, and the intention was to provoke China.
“The best way is for the countries, especially the naval vessels and fighter jets of countries, not to do closing actions around other countries’ territories,” he said. In other words, China is calling on other nations to “mind their own business.”
“We must prevent attempts that try to use those freedom of navigation [patrols], that innocent passage, to exercise hegemony of navigation,” he said.
Li had ample reasons to be on edge, because naval vessels and fighter jets of major players in the international community are showing up in the Indo-Pacific. Germany also threw in its hat by saying it would send two warships to the Indo-Pacific next year.
For the first time ever, and thanks to US President Joe Biden’s promotion of multilateralism since taking office, the idea of uniting global powers to counter China’s ambitions seems to be gaining traction.
Beijing has nobody to blame but itself for international powers deploying a military presence around China. Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) pursuit of the Chinese dream — which is to make China the world’s dominant power — through coercion and nationalism. Even after the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) 20th National Congress, there are no signs of a slowdown in this trajectory.
As Beijing fully demonstrates the hardline “my way or the highway” approach, other nations have resorted to pressuring actions of close monitoring under the US’ leadership. This is what Li has been calling not “innocent passage,” but “hegemony of navigation” in reality. Thus, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s provocative close encounters can be read as a form of “protest.”
As China, for the moment, does not have the military prowess to follow through with its threats, it can only resort to affronting “acts” and “displays.”
This is most apparent when Li made placating remarks at the forum, such as “working together, both [the US and China] will come out as winners; fighting each other, both will lose, and the world will be hurt as well,” or any conflict between the two nations would bring “unbearable disaster for the world.”
Perhaps we would be annoying the CCP again if we say that they are “appeasing” the US, but it is safe to assume that China, which once proposed a “new type of great power relations” concept in the hope of controlling Taiwan and the world, is now nervous when it provoked the US into rallying up its democratic allies into a coalition to counter China.
With the support of China’s neighbors, and those in Southeast Asia and the South China Sea, Biden has the capacity to unite disparate nations to reign in China, enough to form a coalition to take on a “group conflict” scenario.
As for China, what country has stepped up for it? Russia, which is still trapped in a quagmire of its own making? No nation would forfeit its own interests and welfare so that another invading nation can fulfill its own expansionist ambitions. After two unsafe close encounters, it remains to be seen how China would deal with the invitation to a dialogue between the US and Chinese defense leaders. If it is betting on Washington to extend the olive branch first, it might be in for a long, long wait.
Tzou Jiing-wen is editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times, the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times.
Translated by Rita Wang
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS