The US Indo-Pacific Command said that a Chinese warship cut across the path of a US destroyer and a Canadian Navy frigate doing a routine transit in the Taiwan Strait on June 3.
China’s ship, a guided-missile destroyer, crossed the bow of the USS Chung-Hoon at 137m, forcing the US vessel to slow its course to “avoid collision.”
The incident came on the heels of a Chinese fighter jet on May 26 flying in front of the nose of a US Air Force RC-135 aircraft conducting routine operations over the hotly contested South China Sea, which the US Indo-Pacific Command condemned as an “unnecessarily aggressive maneuver” in the air. Details regarding the two close encounters by the US and Canada were revealed to warn the international community of China’s “unsafe and unprofessional” maneuvers.
However, the two partners would continue with their routine patrols in the Indo-Pacific in accordance with the freedom of navigation as international law stipulates. As defense ministers and military officials around the globe convened in Singapore for the Shangri-La Dialogue, it is worth investigating the reasons behind China’s escalating provocations.
US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and Chinese Minister of National Defense Li Shangfu (李尚福) were at the annual defense conference. Li’s words at the forum suggested that the US and its allies had created the danger with their patrols, and the intention was to provoke China.
“The best way is for the countries, especially the naval vessels and fighter jets of countries, not to do closing actions around other countries’ territories,” he said. In other words, China is calling on other nations to “mind their own business.”
“We must prevent attempts that try to use those freedom of navigation [patrols], that innocent passage, to exercise hegemony of navigation,” he said.
Li had ample reasons to be on edge, because naval vessels and fighter jets of major players in the international community are showing up in the Indo-Pacific. Germany also threw in its hat by saying it would send two warships to the Indo-Pacific next year.
For the first time ever, and thanks to US President Joe Biden’s promotion of multilateralism since taking office, the idea of uniting global powers to counter China’s ambitions seems to be gaining traction.
Beijing has nobody to blame but itself for international powers deploying a military presence around China. Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) pursuit of the Chinese dream — which is to make China the world’s dominant power — through coercion and nationalism. Even after the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) 20th National Congress, there are no signs of a slowdown in this trajectory.
As Beijing fully demonstrates the hardline “my way or the highway” approach, other nations have resorted to pressuring actions of close monitoring under the US’ leadership. This is what Li has been calling not “innocent passage,” but “hegemony of navigation” in reality. Thus, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s provocative close encounters can be read as a form of “protest.”
As China, for the moment, does not have the military prowess to follow through with its threats, it can only resort to affronting “acts” and “displays.”
This is most apparent when Li made placating remarks at the forum, such as “working together, both [the US and China] will come out as winners; fighting each other, both will lose, and the world will be hurt as well,” or any conflict between the two nations would bring “unbearable disaster for the world.”
Perhaps we would be annoying the CCP again if we say that they are “appeasing” the US, but it is safe to assume that China, which once proposed a “new type of great power relations” concept in the hope of controlling Taiwan and the world, is now nervous when it provoked the US into rallying up its democratic allies into a coalition to counter China.
With the support of China’s neighbors, and those in Southeast Asia and the South China Sea, Biden has the capacity to unite disparate nations to reign in China, enough to form a coalition to take on a “group conflict” scenario.
As for China, what country has stepped up for it? Russia, which is still trapped in a quagmire of its own making? No nation would forfeit its own interests and welfare so that another invading nation can fulfill its own expansionist ambitions. After two unsafe close encounters, it remains to be seen how China would deal with the invitation to a dialogue between the US and Chinese defense leaders. If it is betting on Washington to extend the olive branch first, it might be in for a long, long wait.
Tzou Jiing-wen is editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times, the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times.
Translated by Rita Wang
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
When a recall campaign targeting the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators was launched, something rather disturbing happened. According to reports, Hualien County Government officials visited several people to verify their signatures. Local authorities allegedly used routine or harmless reasons as an excuse to enter people’s house for investigation. The KMT launched its own recall campaigns, targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers, and began to collect signatures. It has been found that some of the KMT-headed counties and cities have allegedly been mobilizing municipal machinery. In Keelung, the director of the Department of Civil Affairs used the household registration system
RSS