Eight preschool children at a private preschool in New Taipei City’s Banciao District (板橋) have tested positive for barbiturates and benzodiazepines. Prosecutors in the past few days have questioned teachers at the school, who parents accused of drugging their children. The incident sparked a massive public outcry, not only toward the school, but also toward the New Taipei City Government, with many saying its response to the incident was too slow.
The case emerged on May 14 after the parents of three children told police that a teacher at the preschool had drugged their children and imposed corporal punishment on them. However, the city’s education department said it received the report the next day and immediately launched an investigation. Prosecutors searched the preschool on May 18 and detained and questioned the accused teacher. She was released on bail and suspended from work. On May 22, the preschool offered drug tests for children at a medical center. Instead, a parent took his child to three hospitals for blood and urine tests between May 22 and May 29, with results coming back positive for barbiturates on June 1. More parents contacted the police and took their children to get tested.
Two Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers and a parent held a news conference on June 2, in which the parent said he only got a phone call from the education department about the incident. A New Power Party lawmaker and other parents held another news conference on Monday where only one parent said she received a call from the department. Moreover, a DPP lawmaker on Wednesday said a parent said they reported the case to the city government’s 1999 Citizen Hotline and to the mayor’s public contact e-mail in late April, but received no response, so they reported it to the police.
After the news conferences drew public attention, the New Taipei City Department of Health on Monday conducted drug tests at the preschool. Prosecutors conducted an expanded search on Thursday at the homes of the preschool principal and seven teachers, also detaining them for questioning. The education department had planned a meeting with the parents of 67 children at the preschool on Thursday, but suddenly changed it to one-on-one counseling sessions. It held a second closed-door meeting on Friday with New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), but many parents still blamed the city government, demanding that it step in and help them.
As of yesterday, over a dozen parents had filed charges. Eight out of 28 children who underwent drug tests tested positive for barbiturates or benzodiazepines, both controlled substances available only through medical prescription. Both barbiturates and benzodiazepines, which depress the central nervous system, lower the heart rate and induce sedation, are used to treat sleep disorders and anxiety. However, as they are highly addictive, they are used sparingly only for specific, medically supervised cases. Long-term use can cause complications. Withdrawal symptoms include agitation and anxiety.
Hou apologized several times since Thursday, but the city government denied it received a report in April. It said it responded immediately in the middle of last month, evoking the death of a two-year-old boy nicknamed En En (恩恩), who died of complications from COVID-19 last year. The emergency services in New Taipei City were blamed for responding too slowly.
While prosecutors are investigating the preschool case, the city government should promptly offer remediations -— health consultations, school transfers and legal services to help the children and parents. It should also ascertain if drugging has occurred in other preschools or nursing homes, and improve its reporting and investigation procedures, as in the instance of child abuse cases by licensed caregivers or preschools that are also reported each year. Even one case is too many.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged