On May 28, Vice President William Lai (賴清德) said that government agencies were deliberating on the feasibility of maintaining closed nuclear reactors in case of an emergency.
I cannot agree with such a plan.
Laws regarding nuclear power do not apply to an emergency. Unless the laws are amended, Lai’s plan cannot be put into practice. Besides, without careful management, it risks a nuclear catastrophe.
Taiwan relies on imported fuel, including for its nuclear generators. If a blockade of the Taiwan Strait happens, nuclear power would not be an option.
Nuclear power is dependent on other sources of energy: Nuclear reactors would not and cannot work independently.
Moreover, nuclear power can only generate electricity, but society needs other kinds of fuel, including gasoline and diesel, and natural gas.
In terms of wartime security, a nuclear plant or any other massive power facility would easily be targeted by the enemy. It is therefore imperative to develop more power generation facilities and move toward a decentralized power distribution system. Only by doing so can Taiwan enhance the security and stability of its energy supplies.
Unlike nuclear power, renewable energy is self-generated and the development process is decentralized. The electricity generated from renewable sources is diversified — gas, liquid and solid, which is what Taiwan should rely on in an attack or a blockade.
More importantly, renewable sources of energy would never lead to a nuclear disaster, nor would they produce nuclear waste. They have low carbon emissions and are sustainable, which would help Taiwan become a non-nuclear homeland with net zero emissions.
Taiwan should invest more in developing renewable energy to achieve energy independence while bolstering supply security.
Moreover, the homeland would be truly nuclear-free.
Shih Shin-min is founding chairman of the Taiwan Environmental Protection Union.
Translated by Emma Liu
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath