On May 28, Vice President William Lai (賴清德) said that government agencies were deliberating on the feasibility of maintaining closed nuclear reactors in case of an emergency.
I cannot agree with such a plan.
Laws regarding nuclear power do not apply to an emergency. Unless the laws are amended, Lai’s plan cannot be put into practice. Besides, without careful management, it risks a nuclear catastrophe.
Taiwan relies on imported fuel, including for its nuclear generators. If a blockade of the Taiwan Strait happens, nuclear power would not be an option.
Nuclear power is dependent on other sources of energy: Nuclear reactors would not and cannot work independently.
Moreover, nuclear power can only generate electricity, but society needs other kinds of fuel, including gasoline and diesel, and natural gas.
In terms of wartime security, a nuclear plant or any other massive power facility would easily be targeted by the enemy. It is therefore imperative to develop more power generation facilities and move toward a decentralized power distribution system. Only by doing so can Taiwan enhance the security and stability of its energy supplies.
Unlike nuclear power, renewable energy is self-generated and the development process is decentralized. The electricity generated from renewable sources is diversified — gas, liquid and solid, which is what Taiwan should rely on in an attack or a blockade.
More importantly, renewable sources of energy would never lead to a nuclear disaster, nor would they produce nuclear waste. They have low carbon emissions and are sustainable, which would help Taiwan become a non-nuclear homeland with net zero emissions.
Taiwan should invest more in developing renewable energy to achieve energy independence while bolstering supply security.
Moreover, the homeland would be truly nuclear-free.
Shih Shin-min is founding chairman of the Taiwan Environmental Protection Union.
Translated by Emma Liu
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS