There is a worrisome trend toward militarization I observe in Taiwanese society, that I do not think has been commented on.
The trend is broadly supported not only by the Taiwanese public and politicians, but by virtually every foreign commentator, politician and expert on Taiwan affairs. I see a vast militarization taking place in Taiwan, with all the negatives that can come with that.
This can be seen not least in this newspaper, the Taipei Times, in which military acquisitions, preparedness and the acute danger of an imminent full-scale attack by China are splashed across page one and beyond in virtually every single issue.
Militarization is the process by which a society organizes itself wholly for military conflict and violence, not least in terms of policies of required military service (usually for men, but women, too), massive arms purchases, arms races, the consolidation of power by politicians, military industrial complexes, the infusion of military language and imagery into journalism and other forms of communication and a top-down, masculine, patriarchal mindset.
It is a belief that a country must maintain a strong military capability and be prepared to use it to defend or promote national interests, although what those “interests” are may be subject to a variety of interpretations. Militarization can infuse itself into all levels of society, and become a dominant outlook that excludes more humane, benevolent and even civilized attitudes.
The establishment of a dominant military, aggressive, war-oriented purview of all life and existence is far from the best way to conduct an entire, modern society, and excludes the better values noted here.
I see something like this in Taiwan, and hope for something better.
Many holding the opposite, militarized view, are likely to proclaim that I am “anti-Taiwan,” “pro-China” and simply ignoring the pressing reality of the potential warfare that could occur in the Taiwan Strait.
I of course acknowledge that China’s recent rhetoric and military maneuvers around Taiwan have been worrisome in their own right, although in some ways you might say these are not dramatically different from what many other countries do during military procedures.
China’s military excursions, live-fire drills and crossing of the prescribed demarcations that are meant to keep nations at bay are all worrisome to the extreme, and are indications of a militarized nation exhibiting improper adventurism.
They are not to be accepted, and Taiwan must guard against them. This might undermine my claim here, and it might be that militarization and war readiness is simply a reality in modern world affairs.
At the same time, the very negative side of militarization and militarism must be considered. As one online commentator put it, this trend is about the conversion of civilians into soldiers, a new normal, something that has been seen in Taiwan often in the past few years (talk of a “civilian defense force” is common).
These processes can influence societies and cultures overtly and subtly, and are often cloaked in miscommunication, faked data and a belief in the “biological certainty” of war.
Militarization often promotes philosophies of innate violence and the legitimacy and inevitability of military conflict, in an attempt to acclimatize people to militarism and war.
Militarization programs are systems and visions of the state’s “moral universe” — what citizens think, believe and feel — and they shape visions, to turn to the online source Science Direct, “which shape ideas about soldiering, killing, allegiance, human rights, conceptions of justice and law ... political economy, and form the ‘justification’ for the use of military violence.”
I cannot say to what extent Taiwan might demilitarize, much less announce its neutrality, in coming years, but the current, common militarized ideals should not be glibly accepted and promoted in this truly liberal, contemporary, autonomous society.
David Pendery is an associate professor at the National Taipei University of Business.
Speaking at the Asia-Pacific Forward Forum in Taipei, former Singaporean minister for foreign affairs George Yeo (楊榮文) proposed a “Chinese commonwealth” as a potential framework for political integration between Taiwan and China. Yeo said the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait is unsustainable and that Taiwan should not be “a piece on the chessboard” in a geopolitical game between China and the US. Yeo’s remark is nothing but an ill-intentioned political maneuver that is made by all pro-China politicians in Singapore. Since when does a Southeast Asian nation have the right to stick its nose in where it is not wanted
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has released a plan to economically integrate China’s Fujian Province with Taiwan’s Kinmen County, outlining a cross-strait development project based on six major themes and 21 measures. This official document by the CCP is directed toward Taiwan’s three outlying island counties: Penghu County, Lienchiang County (Matsu) and Kinmen County. The plan sets out to construct a cohabiting sphere between Kinmen and the nearby Chinese city of Xiamen, as well as between Matsu and Fuzhou. It also aims to bring together Minnanese cultural areas including Taiwan’s Penghu and China’s cities of Quanzhou and Zhangzhou for further integrated
During a recent visit to Taiwan, I encountered repeated questions about “America skepticism” among the body politic. The basic premise of the “America skepticism” theory is that Taiwan people should view the United States as an unreliable, self-interested actor who is using Taiwan for its own purposes. According to this theory, America will abandon Taiwan when its interests are advanced by doing so. At one level, such skepticism is a sign of a healthy, well-functioning democratic society that protects the right for vigorous political debate. Indeed, around the world, the people of Taiwan are far from alone in debating America’s reliability
As China’s economy was meant to drive global economic growth this year, its dramatic slowdown is sounding alarm bells across the world, with economists and experts criticizing Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for his unwillingness or inability to respond to the nation’s myriad mounting crises. The Wall Street Journal reported that investors have been calling on Beijing to take bolder steps to boost output — especially by promoting consumer spending — but Xi has deep-rooted philosophical objections to Western-style consumption-driven growth, seeing it as wasteful and at odds with his goal of making China a world-leading industrial and technological powerhouse, and
RSS