India’s nuanced yet clear and consistent stance on the Taiwan Strait can be deciphered and inferred from Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s address at the recent G7 summit in Hiroshima, Japan.
The allusion to tensions in the Taiwan Strait and China’s saber rattling was very much discernable when he pitched for a collective voice against unilateral attempts to change the “status quo,” asserting that any tension and disputes should be resolved peacefully through dialogue and diplomacy.
The message is loud and clear to China and its belligerence not only in the Line of Actual Control (LAC) on the India-China border; but also in the South and East China seas and, more importantly, the Taiwan Strait.
India-Taiwan relations have been growing steadily notwithstanding the lack of diplomatic relations between the two vibrant democracies. India’s response to the tension in the Taiwan Strait has been muted. When turbulence surfaced in the Strait, and China indulged in live-fire military exercises and violated the median line in August last year in the wake of a visit by then-US House of Representatives speaker Nancy Pelosi to Taiwan, an Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson articulated India’s nuanced response, which was prominently reported and commented in the Taiwanese media. India urged restraint and the avoidance of unilateral action to change the “status quo.” India also bemoaned the “militarization of the Taiwan Strait.”
Yet another instance of India’s support to Taiwan is its outreach to the South Pacific island nations, some of which are Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, such as Nauru, Palau and the Marshal Islands, at a time when Beijing’s footprints in the Pacific islands have become more pronounced, with China and the Solomon Islands signing the security agreement raising concerns.
Modi also on Monday last week cochaired and addressed the Forum for India-Pacific Island Cooperation Summit in Papua New Guinea. Discernable observers could see the elephant in the room and India’s commitment to a free, open and inclusive Indo-Pacific, which is seamlessly connected with the Taiwan Strait.
He also stressed respect for the sovereignty and territory of all countries. It is no coincidence that on the day Modi addressed the forum, the US signed a defense pact with Papua New Guinea, giving its forces access to the nation’s airfields to check China’s growing clout in the region.
Papua New Guinea’s location just north of Australia makes the pact strategically significant, which riled China. The pact provides a framework to help improve security cooperation, increase the size of Papua New Guinea’s defense forces and bolster regional stability.
While Beijing frowned upon the pact as a “geopolitical game,” Russia criticized the G7 as an incubator for anti-Russian and anti-Chinese hysteria.
After the Russian invasion of Ukraine, when there are concerns that China would be tempted to invade Taiwan, Modi in a significant strategic posturing met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on the margins of the G7 summit and said that India would do whatever it can to end the war in Ukraine.
This articulation has traction for Taiwan in view of growing ties between Taiwan and Ukraine. India has been pursuing a very calibrated approach to Ukraine, striking a fine balance between its long-standing strategic ally Russia and the US, with whom India’s strategic partnership has been upgraded to a “global strategic partnership.”
India’s principled position on the complex Ukraine imbroglio was articulated earlier in a carefully worded statement during the voting of the US-sponsored UN resolution deploring the Russian aggression against Ukraine.
It said: “We urge that all efforts are made for the immediate cessation of violence and hostilities. We are also deeply concerned about the welfare of the Indian community, including a large number of students, in Ukraine. The contemporary global order has been built on the UN Charter, international law, and respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of states. All members need to honor these principles. Dialogue is the only way to settle disputes... It is a matter of regret that the path of diplomacy was given up. For these reasons, India has chosen to abstain from the resolution.”
India’s abstention in a US-sponsored UN resolution deploring the Russian invasion of Ukraine should be seen in conjunction with this statement and not in isolation.
Be that as it may, the G7 summit has reiterated once again its firm commitment to Taiwan and to a rules-based world order. Now more than ever, the democratic world, including India, are resolute in their resolve to safeguard democracy and human rights the world over.
Rup Narayan Das is a Delhi-based foreign policy analyst and a Taiwan fellow in 2022.
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
Life as we know it will probably not come to an end in Japan this weekend, but what if it does? That is the question consuming a disaster-prone country ahead of a widely spread prediction of disaster that one comic book suggests would occur tomorrow. The Future I Saw, a manga by Ryo Tatsuki about her purported ability to see the future in dreams, was first published in 1999. It would have faded into obscurity, but for the mention of a tsunami and the cover that read “Major disaster in March 2011.” Years later, when the most powerful earthquake ever
RSS