A wave of newly approved abortion restrictions in the southeastern US has sent providers scrambling to reconfigure their services for a region with already severely limited access.
Stiff limitations enacted in South Carolina and pending in North Carolina and Florida — states that had been holdouts providing wider access to the procedure — are threatening to further delay abortions as appointments pile up and doctors work to understand the latest constraints.
“There’s really going to be no way for the whole abortion-providing ecosystem to manage it all,” Planned Parenthood South Atlantic president Jenny Black said.
Black, who oversees the organization’s work in North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia and parts of Virginia, said that providers have had to quickly determine how to comply with the pending laws amid the “decimation of abortion access across the South.”
She said new restrictions would compound the stressors on a system that was already seeing lengthy waiting periods in North Carolina driven by an influx of patients from Georgia and Tennessee.
Abortion is severely restricted in much of the South, including bans throughout pregnancy in Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia. In Georgia, it is allowed only in the first six weeks.
South Carolina joined its neighbors rolling back the procedure on Thursday when the governor signed a bill banning most abortions at six weeks of pregnancy. Providers quickly filed a lawsuit seeking to block the law that resembles one already deemed a violation of the state constitution’s right to privacy by the South Carolina Supreme Court.
“This is a great day for life in South Carolina, but the fight is not over. We stand ready to defend this legislation against any challenges and are confident we will succeed,” Republican South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster said in a statement.
A report released early last month by the Society of Family Planning found rising numbers of abortions in states near those with the deepest restrictions but where abortion had remained largely legal. Florida and North Carolina were among the states with the biggest increases — and among those where new limits are pending.
Most abortions after 12 weeks of pregnancy would be banned in North Carolina beginning from July 1 and a six-week ban in Florida is to take effect only if the state’s current 15-week ban is upheld by the state supreme court.
South Carolina had also proven to be a key destination for people seeking abortions.
Provisional South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control data showed that larger numbers of out-of-state patients after the state’s highest court overturned previous restrictions and left abortion legal through 22 weeks.
The new law would change that status, Middlebury College economics professor Caitlin Myers said.
Myers, who studies the effects of reproductive policies, said limited evidence suggests that about half of the people who want abortions would not be able to make the six-week threshold.
“It’s likely to end up sending a lot of desperate people seeking abortions even farther distances and result in even greater congestion at the facilities that are left to receive them,” Myers said.
Jessica Tarleton, an obstetrician-gynecologist in Charleston, South Carolina, said she anticipates sending patients outside the state for abortions.
She said the new law would disproportionately affect those who lack financial means for childcare, hotels and air travel.
Most women who get abortions are already mothers, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data showed.
The action came as many state legislatures convene for their first regular sessions since the US Supreme Court struck federal abortion protections. Over the past two months, Republican officials in North Carolina, South Carolina and Florida have pushed Virginia closer to being a regional outlier as a place with relatively permissive access.
The tide of state-level activity has been welcomed by anti-abortion groups who had long chipped away at access.
Caitlin Connors, southern regional director for Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, said the legislative changes were victories made possible by last year’s ruling.
“We are officially in an era where states who have tried to pass pro-life legislation — laws that would protect unborn children, laws that would also implement services for moms and families and babies — to finally be able to be enacted and not be under the chokehold of the Roe v Wade decision,” Connors said.
That shifting landscape has also heightened uncertainty among providers that has kept them from expanding services, and likely would prevent some patients from getting abortions as doctors weigh what is and is not permissible, Myers said.
Erica Pettigrew, a family doctor in North Carolina, said the new constraints would make it much more difficult for her to help patients navigate the system.
Although North Carolina Republicans pitched the new 12-week limit as a middle-ground change, Pettigrew said that other provisions make it much more restrictive.
New hurdles require that women make in-person visits to a medical professional at least 72 hours before the procedure. The three-day waiting period could previously be initiated over the telephone. The law also requires a doctor to schedule a follow-up visit for women who have a medically induced abortion, increasing the hardship on those who travel from other states.
The regulations would make it more difficult to advise patients on their options, especially when waiting periods already spanned two to four weeks in some cases, she said.
Other delays might result from what Pettigrew called unclear exceptions for certain life-threatening conditions.
“Now we’re in this horrible purgatory of trying to figure out how to interpret it, how we can comply with the law,” Pettigrew said. “There’s so many unknowns.”
Immediate reproductive care has been slowed in states restricting abortion, and Tarleton said South Carolina would be no different. The new law mandates that doctors document their rationale for inducing an abortion under a list of excepted circumstances and make “reasonable efforts” to avoid the procedure.
She said she expects to seek legal advice when treating patients for early pregnancy complications and miscarriages, which she fears would increase maternal mortality in a region where many states already report some of the nation’s worst rates.
“We are likely to see sicker pregnant patients, sicker babies,” Tarleton said. “That’s going to start happening now that there’s really no place to turn in the southeast for this kind of care.”
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS