Although the Taiwan Stock Exchange has approved a proposal to establish the nation’s first digital carbon exchange, seen as an important step in reaching the government’s carbon neutral goal by 2050, the exchange would not be ready until next year, while the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) is still working out carbon pricing and trading rules. However, Taiwan is already lagging behind the rest of the world in tackling climate change, and trading carbon credits, one of the last resorts in trying to limit emissions, is only part of a broader strategy.
From its inception, the carbon exchange would only be a consultancy offering suggestions about carbon emissions and future carbon credit trading. It would have initial capital of NT$1 billion (US$32.62 million), jointly funded by the Taiwan Stock Exchange and the National Development Fund.
Many developed countries have or plan to launch a carbon exchange this year. The EU has been leading the world in tackling climate change, and also seeks to be carbon neutral by 2050. To reach that goal, it created the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), which went into effect earlier this month. Under the agreement, importers of targeted goods must buy CBAM certificates to cover the emissions associated with their products. As the tariff initially only covers select heavy emission industries such as cement, iron, steel, fertilizer, electricity, aluminum and hydrogen, the effect on Taiwanese exporters appears limited. The CBAM also seeks to avoid “carbon leakages” — the replacement of less carbon-intensive EU goods or allocation of manufacturing sites from the EU to areas with less strict requirements.
About 5 to 7 percent of Taiwan’s information and communications technology companies and 15 to 25 percent of metal goods producers are included in the CBAM. While that represents a small portion of Taiwan’s industries, as the rules broaden to include more categories, the number of affected businesses will grow. Companies have already started calculating their carbon footprints and are seeking certifications to comply with the law, as well as to meet requests from customers.
In announcing its 2050 ambitions, the government provided only rough guidelines to the public and industries. While Taiwan has a clear energy policy and aims to dramatically increase the percentage of energy from renewable sources, the government did not set caps on carbon emissions and did not disclose specifics on cutting emissions, leaving businesses and households in the dark on how to comply. Collecting carbon fees and launching a carbon exchange are a good start, but efficiency is the next problem. The EPA has not yet set a carbon pricing mechanism and carbon trading rules, which are the foundation of a carbon market. Meanwhile, Taiwan is also falling behind some developing countries in Southeast Asia. Indonesia and Malaysia announced that they would launch carbon exchanges in the second half of this year.
Taiwanese exporters are under mounting pressure to match customers’ needs to lower carbon emissions or risk losing orders. About 19 local enterprises including the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, have joined the global initiative RE100 to reduce emissions. To help companies meet customer demands and overseas regulations, the EPA should quickly establish prices and come up with rules for buying and selling carbon credits.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS