Few countries confront a singular threat that consumes the sole focus of national defense as Taiwan does. Much of this has to do with a growing fear of China’s armed unification plan, whether it be a small-scale military operation to force Taiwan into negotiations or more belligerent options.
Meanwhile, China has strengthened autocratic rule guided by Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era to secure its smooth rise to global leadership. Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) governing agenda prioritizes the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) leadership and discipline, national security concerns and a determination to bring Taiwan into its orbit.
Responding to new uncertainties in the regional balance of power, G7 leaders avoided presenting an anti-CCP united front at this year’s summit and expressed their wish to keep peace across the Taiwan Strait. The summit also included Australia, India, Brazil, South Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Comoros (representing the African Union) and the Cook Islands (representing the Pacific Islands Forum).
By connecting the G7 with the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue and Pacific Islands Forum, the US maximizes freedom of policy options while enabling allied states to pursue bilateral ties with Taiwan. Such a public display of flexible cross-alliance unity not only displays Washington’s and Tokyo’s commitment to stabilizing the Taiwan Strait, but also makes it harder for Beijing to weaponize its economic leverage against allies.
In this hostile environment, incorporating Taiwan into its multilateral frameworks in the Indo-Pacific region is of great urgency for the US. Chinese political scientist Ye Xiaodi (?曉迪) wrote an article in Pacific Focus last year titled “Alliance Coordination: Explaining the Logic of Biden’s Taiwan Policy.”
Ye wrote that US President Joe Biden has convinced European and Pacific allies to concern themselves with Taiwan in response to China’s growing influence, and has advanced a policy of strategic clarity regarding Taiwan.
Recognizing Taiwan as a crucial non-NATO ally and a global technological powerhouse, Biden’s administration has introduced legislation to normalize arms sales and pursue free-trade agreements with it.
The speed of US alliance coordination seems to have constrained China’s strategy to achieve unification on two fronts.
First, the US has empowered allies to re-evaluate the “one China” principle. More foreign leaders and lawmakers are visiting Taiwan, undermining the decades-long perception of cross-strait relations and enabling allies to seek direct engagement with Taiwan.
Second, Taiwan’s pro-independence sentiment has generated a widespread global consensus, as evidenced by former British prime minister Liz Truss’ visit last week and then-US House of Representatives speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit last year.
The more globalized the Taiwan issue is, the more support there will be for keeping it a liberal and democratic state. It would therefore be difficult for the CCP to galvanize Taiwan’s pro-unification sentiment for New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate in next year’s presidential election.
This year’s G7 has increased strategic resonance among allies, prompting them to associate their national interests with Taiwan’s security. While China is blaming the US for weaponizing the multilateral framework of alliance engagement, the dual internationalization of the Taiwan issue and Taiwan’s pro-independence movement is a political headache and forces Beijing to deal with multiple regional players at once.
Joseph Tse-hei Lee is professor of history at Pace University in New York.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS