On Wednesday last week, a regrettable incident happened on the Taichung MRT Green Line, causing one death. The woman who died was Providence University Department of Law instructor Lin Shu-ya (林淑雅), who had devoted herself to social movements, including the campaign to abolish the death penalty.
Her grieving mother said that she wished she could have died instead of her daughter, making headlines in some media in the run-up to Mother’s Day on Sunday.
However, because Lin had supported the abolition of the death penalty, her mother’s statement, with its implication of “a life for a life,” was over-emphasized, with some opponents of abolishing the death penalty making a big deal of it on social media.
Some news Web sites had a lot of comments along these lines, as if Lin were a villain who had caused the deaths of many others, rather than a campaigner devoted to human rights protections.
The television drama series Copycat Killer (模仿犯) has introduced many Taiwanese unfamiliar with mystery novels to the name Miyuki Miyabe — the author of the novel on which the series is based.
My favorite books by Miyabe are the Saburo Sugimura series, later made into a Japanese TV drama with Kotaro Koizumi playing the role of Sugimura, the main character.
The second novel in the series, Nameless Poison, refers to a poison that is hard to identify. This kind of poison comes from people, and some are more toxic than others.
In the novels, Sugimura believes that humans used to be afraid of wild beasts, but after trapping wild beasts and naming them, humans changed their formless fear into a visible one that was easier to cope with.
However, poison that comes from people remains nameless, which makes it harder to handle.
Those who oppose the abolition of the death penalty and posted comments mocking Lin brought to mind this nameless poison. Is it a collective malice?
What is it that can suddenly turn ordinary white-collar workers, neighbors and loving parents into vicious, illogical, poisonous snakes that bite anything that moves?
Some people believe it is online anonymity, while others say it is social polarization. Either way, they are only partly right.
The poison that Miyabe wrote about existed long before the Internet and online groups. It lies hidden in the human heart, always looking for a chance to spew out.
When you join a group on social media or a messaging platform, it is hard to avoid coming across a few of these toxic people.
The only way to avoid getting poisoned is to block them on the platform or avoid them. Considering their toxicity, avoid engaging with them. Any attempt at rational communication would only provoke them. There are better things to do.
We must remember that we are all toxic, and we should try to leave the poison in our hearts and not pour it out on social media.
Unfortunately, there are some people out there who cannot resist trying to poison others. Keep clear of such people.
Chang Yueh-han holds a doctorate in journalism and communications from Shih Hsin University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
Last month, two major diplomatic events unfolded in Southeast Asia that suggested subtle shifts in the region’s strategic landscape. The 46th ASEAN Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-Gulf-Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Trilateral Summit in Kuala Lumpur coincided with French President Emmanuel Macron’s high-profile visits to Vietnam, Indonesia and Singapore. Together, they highlighted ASEAN’s maturing global posture, deepening regional integration and China’s intensifying efforts to recalibrate its economic diplomacy amid uncertainties posed by the US. The ASEAN summit took place amid rising protectionist policies from the US, notably sweeping tariffs on goods from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, with duties as high as 49 percent.
RSS