During the night of May 4, the Ukrainian Air Force, using a newly supplied Patriot missile system, intercepted a Russian Kh-47M2 Kinzhal missile — an air-launched ballistic missile capable of reaching hypersonic speeds — over a region outside Kyiv. This was a huge milestone for Ukraine and a testament to the significant improvements made to its air defense network since the onset of the war. Previously, Ukrainian officials had said that they were unable to defend against Russian high-speed missiles without Western-supplied advanced air defense systems.
With a Ukrainian counteroffensive looming, Russia has once again intensified its bombardment of the nation. On May 1, Ukraine said that its air defenses had intercepted 15 of 18 cruise missiles launched from Russian strategic bombers.
The types of weapon systems used in a war matter, and the war in Ukraine has demonstrated the importance of advanced, albeit expensive, air defense systems in a prolonged conventional conflict. They offer interception capabilities that relatively cheap, mass-produced portable air defense systems cannot effectively provide.
These systems have greatly reduced the potency of Russian bombardments, especially as Ukraine needs to protect critical infrastructure and logistics ahead of its counteroffensive.
Ukraine’s recent successes in missile interception should also be attributed to NATO early warnings and intelligence sharing with Kyiv. NATO satellites and drones constantly surveil Russian bomber movements, greatly helping Ukraine anticipate the timing and direction of missile attacks. Without the element of surprise, Russia would have to increasingly rely on costlier hypersonic missiles to penetrate Ukraine’s air defenses.
Taiwan also plans to improve its air defense network with the Patriot missile system. Last year, the US proposed upgrading Taiwan’s existing Patriot systems with as many as 100 of Lockheed Martin’s hit-to-kill Patriot Advanced Capability-3 Missile Segment Enhancement missiles.
Given the high cost of the missiles, some critics have said that they do not align with Taiwan’s asymmetrical defense strategy. This sentiment was shared by several military analysts during the early months of the war in Ukraine. They said that Ukraine should not be provided with advanced conventional weapons as Kyiv did not stand a chance in a conventional war.
With the benefit of hindsight, their arguments have been largely discredited. Ukrainian defenders have proven their ability to quickly learn and operate advanced weapon systems, such as the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System, to exact devastating blows on Russia’s ability to mount large offensives.
University of St Andrews strategic studies professor Phillips O’Brien said that “what this war has shown is that a democratic, committed nation such as Ukraine can achieve things far more quickly and efficiently than a dictatorship.”
Similarly, Taiwan must also obtain such capabilities even when they come with a high price tag. Advanced conventional weapon systems will continue to play an important role in warfare, as well as a deterrent.
Publicizing the success of Ukraine’s air defense diminishes the propaganda value of “unstoppable” Chinese missile attacks on Taiwan. As debates surrounding national defense once again renew due to next year’s presidential election, voters should keep in mind the lessons from the Ukrainian war and not fall for those promoting the invincibility of the Chinese armed forces to intimidate Taiwan into submission.
Linus Chiou studies physics and history at the University of Virginia.
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) arrest is a significant development. He could have become president or vice president on a shared TPP-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket and could have stood again in 2028. If he is found guilty, there would be little chance of that, but what of his party? What about the third force in Taiwanese politics? What does this mean for the disenfranchised young people who he attracted, and what does it mean for his ambitious and ideologically fickle right-hand man, TPP caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? Ko and Huang have been appealing to that
RSS