In what Michael Driscoll, the head of the FBI’s New York field office called a “blatant violation of our national sovereignty,” two Chinese men allegedly set up a secret police station in the city.
The station apparently performed public services such as helping Chinese renew their Chinese driver’s license. It also helped the Chinese government locate a rights advocate of Chinese descent, among other services to Beijing.
Driscoll is right: Such activities are a violation of US sovereignty. New York is not the only city to have these overseas “police stations” set up, either. Offices have been reported in many countries, including in North America and Europe. Operatives working out of them have reportedly sought to identify, intimidate and silence dissidents living overseas, and to spread pro-China propaganda.
Responding to news of the New York arrests, Ghulam Yaghma, president of the government-in-exile of East Turkestan — the Uighurs’ name for China’s Xinjiang region — called on the US government to address not only Chinese espionage and transnational repression in the US, but of all Uighurs and other East Turkestanis.
Despite the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) repeated criticism of other countries infringing on or interfering in China’s sovereignty and national jurisdiction, it is guilty of sanctioning, orchestrating or being directly involved in these very things, in what is known as transnational suppression.
It does this on two levels: by setting up physical “police stations” overseas without authorization, and by recruiting or sending operatives overseas to intimidate what the CCP considers dissidents and their families to “persuade” them to return to China.
Research conducted by the University of Sheffield in the UK for a report, titled We know you better than you know yourself: China’s transnational repression of the Uyghur diaspora, shows that the Uighurs who participated said they had experienced some form of Chinese surveillance, apart from those whose families had already been imprisoned, and almost all had been asked to conduct surveillance of other Uighurs on behalf of the Chinese police. They reported pressure to inform on other members of the community, under threat of harm to family members living in Xinjiang.
About two-thirds of Uighurs surveyed “have been directly threatened and experienced threats to their family while living in the UK,” and this was the case for about 80 percent of Uighur respondents living in Turkey, the report said.
China considers “all citizens, former citizens and their family members, regardless of location, to be under its legal and moral jurisdiction,” and that its “transnational repression globally exports its domestic model of governance and genocidal oppression,” it said.
The persecution of Uighurs is nothing new; the CCP has been repressing Uighur rights advocates globally since the 1990s, but the scale has grown significantly under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), and especially in the past five years.
What is it about the CCP that drives it to assume ahistorical — in the sense that if it believes it ever had a claim, that claim exists “in perpetuity,” irrespective of the historical circumstances — territorial rights and feels the best way to assimilate reluctant populations is to terrorize them? What makes it feel it is within its rights to repress its own population and its diaspora?
Taiwanese implicitly understand the connection between the experience of Hong Kongers and their own possible future. They should look at what is happening to the Uighur population of Xinjiang and the Uighur diaspora, too.
Whoever wins next year’s election in Taiwan needs to bear that in mind, and candidates should not spread the false narrative that the CCP can be negotiated with on Taiwan’s future.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
On Sunday, elite free solo climber Alex Honnold — famous worldwide for scaling sheer rock faces without ropes — climbed Taipei 101, once the world’s tallest building and still the most recognizable symbol of Taiwan’s modern identity. Widespread media coverage not only promoted Taiwan, but also saw the Republic of China (ROC) flag fluttering beside the building, breaking through China’s political constraints on Taiwan. That visual impact did not happen by accident. Credit belongs to Taipei 101 chairwoman Janet Chia (賈永婕), who reportedly took the extra step of replacing surrounding flags with the ROC flag ahead of the climb. Just
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS