The job market has never offered any guarantees. Mechanization wiped out once-secure careers in manufacturing. Now artificial intelligence (AI) is coming for a future generation of jobs that had seemed safe, starting with software coding and back-office work. So what can be done about it?
Despite some hyperbolic fears, there are reasons to be optimistic about the future of technology. It has the potential to bring a better quality of life and more widespread prosperity — eventually. To prosper in this future, workers need new skills and a different education. That means rethinking how we approach college and what we want it to provide us.
Most college degrees pay off not only in higher wages, but because they mean graduates are less likely to be unemployed, or be unemployed for less time. Evolving technology in the late 20th century put a higher premium on more education, leading more people to go to college.
Illustration: Yusha
The share of the population over the age of 25 with some post-secondary education doubled between 1980 and 2021 to more than 60 percent. This increased the supply of graduates and shrunk the wage premium for college degrees.
More people going to college also means more bad outcomes: more dropouts and more degrees that do not pay off. Meanwhile, the price of education has skyrocketed. So it is no surprise that many people are asking if college is even worth it anymore.
It is. With new technology it will be more valuable than ever.
If the past is any guide, thriving in an age of technological innovation requires being adaptable and finding different ways to add value. For example, machines that could weave cloth at scale displaced many workers, but master craftspeople who made goods of exceptional quality still had jobs. Other people had to learn how to work a machine.
It was not an easy transition; there was a lot of social upheaval and displacement. How the population was educated changed to suit the new economy, and it took several decades for workers to adapt. Industrialization is a big reason universal public education was adopted.
Today’s technology arguably poses more challenges because some white-collar jobs are sure to disappear, too. So far, large language models such as ChatGPT are good at synthesizing existing information to make a decent argument or find a solution to problems. The technology is only going to get more powerful, although its creative abilities are likely to be limited.
Psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer says that AI is better suited to tasks where risks are well defined and the parameters are stable, such as playing chess. It is less good at dealing with problems where there is more uncertainty. We are likely to face more of the latter, because data and knowledge from the past tells little about a fast-changing future. Past data can even be misleading.
Human judgement can be expected to remain critical, and the value might even be super-charged for people who learn to use the new technology properly, Gigerenzer says.
Interpersonal skills will also be prized. High-touch human time will be the rarest of commodities. Most importantly, thriving would require constantly learning new things and adapting swiftly, because no one knows how new technology will unfold.
In short, success is likely to come to those who know how to think and think well. This means students must hone their critical thinking skills as part of their education.
Getting that out of a college degree requires two things: different expectations and class selection on the part of students, and for universities and colleges to revamp their approach to curricula.
Even before AI, society struggled to figure out what a post-secondary education should provide. US universities and colleges were originally intended to be liberal arts institutions that aimed to make well-rounded, thoughtful leaders. In contrast to the European model where students specialize early, US students were meant to get a more cursory exposure to many different fields.
This was reasonable when a small share of the population went to college and it was not too expensive, but as more people pursued higher education and costs rose, the expectation changed. Students wanted a more vocational and career-focused education, and were less interested in reading Plato.
Meanwhile, colleges and universities stopped doing either job well. Many students struggle to apply their degree to the job market, and the education they receive has become less rigorous.
One study found little improvement in critical-thinking skills during the first few years among 45 percent of students.
It is understandable the people want a clearer path to a career from their degrees, but treating college strictly as vocational education limits students’ skills. Now that critical and creative-thinking skills are even more essential, US schools should embrace and improve on their original mission that aims to produce well-rounded thinkers.
There are ways to make any college major more practical or to integrate the humanities, says Preston Cooper, a fellow at the Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity who has researched the value of degrees.
For instance, high-return degrees such as nursing could include more liberal arts classes. More traditional humanities majors, such as history, could include marketing and communications courses. This would impart hard skills and broader thinking ability, and students would enter the labor force more employable and adaptable.
In the short run, it is up to students to challenge themselves and take the initiative to make their college education more AI-proof. They need to seek out the classes that make them think more rigorously, including math, and probability and statistics. Then balance those with humanities where they learn history and how to write well.
AI might do more writing for us in the future, but knowing how to write well helps clarify and organize your thoughts.
Students should develop a reading list that allows them to explore the great minds of the past and contemplate how to apply their insights to current times.
Here are a few recommendations to start with: Plato’s The Republic — the best book on the nature of education and its relationship to politics; Machiavelli’s The Prince — on how to master fortune as far as humanly possible; Abraham Lincoln’s greatest speeches — statesmanship at the highest level; Hannah Arendt’s The Origins of Totalitarianism — perspectives on how to respond to efforts to dehumanize; and Roderick Floud’s and Deirdre McCloskey’s Economic History of Britain — how does a market come into being and change the world?
Face it, harder classes mean a lot more work and might mean worse grades, but it would be the best insurance students can get from whatever change technology is going to be throwing at them.
This is how they can get greater value from their degree — and in the new economy it will be more valuable than ever. The sooner they get started the better.
Allison Schrager is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering economics and a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion
of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) has said that the armed forces must reach a high level of combat readiness by 2027. That date was not simply picked out of a hat. It has been bandied around since 2021, and was mentioned most recently by US Senator John Cornyn during a question to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a US Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday. It first surfaced during a hearing in the US in 2021, when then-US Navy admiral Philip Davidson, who was head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said: “The threat [of military
RSS