The job market has never offered any guarantees. Mechanization wiped out once-secure careers in manufacturing. Now artificial intelligence (AI) is coming for a future generation of jobs that had seemed safe, starting with software coding and back-office work. So what can be done about it?
Despite some hyperbolic fears, there are reasons to be optimistic about the future of technology. It has the potential to bring a better quality of life and more widespread prosperity — eventually. To prosper in this future, workers need new skills and a different education. That means rethinking how we approach college and what we want it to provide us.
Most college degrees pay off not only in higher wages, but because they mean graduates are less likely to be unemployed, or be unemployed for less time. Evolving technology in the late 20th century put a higher premium on more education, leading more people to go to college.
Illustration: Yusha
The share of the population over the age of 25 with some post-secondary education doubled between 1980 and 2021 to more than 60 percent. This increased the supply of graduates and shrunk the wage premium for college degrees.
More people going to college also means more bad outcomes: more dropouts and more degrees that do not pay off. Meanwhile, the price of education has skyrocketed. So it is no surprise that many people are asking if college is even worth it anymore.
It is. With new technology it will be more valuable than ever.
If the past is any guide, thriving in an age of technological innovation requires being adaptable and finding different ways to add value. For example, machines that could weave cloth at scale displaced many workers, but master craftspeople who made goods of exceptional quality still had jobs. Other people had to learn how to work a machine.
It was not an easy transition; there was a lot of social upheaval and displacement. How the population was educated changed to suit the new economy, and it took several decades for workers to adapt. Industrialization is a big reason universal public education was adopted.
Today’s technology arguably poses more challenges because some white-collar jobs are sure to disappear, too. So far, large language models such as ChatGPT are good at synthesizing existing information to make a decent argument or find a solution to problems. The technology is only going to get more powerful, although its creative abilities are likely to be limited.
Psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer says that AI is better suited to tasks where risks are well defined and the parameters are stable, such as playing chess. It is less good at dealing with problems where there is more uncertainty. We are likely to face more of the latter, because data and knowledge from the past tells little about a fast-changing future. Past data can even be misleading.
Human judgement can be expected to remain critical, and the value might even be super-charged for people who learn to use the new technology properly, Gigerenzer says.
Interpersonal skills will also be prized. High-touch human time will be the rarest of commodities. Most importantly, thriving would require constantly learning new things and adapting swiftly, because no one knows how new technology will unfold.
In short, success is likely to come to those who know how to think and think well. This means students must hone their critical thinking skills as part of their education.
Getting that out of a college degree requires two things: different expectations and class selection on the part of students, and for universities and colleges to revamp their approach to curricula.
Even before AI, society struggled to figure out what a post-secondary education should provide. US universities and colleges were originally intended to be liberal arts institutions that aimed to make well-rounded, thoughtful leaders. In contrast to the European model where students specialize early, US students were meant to get a more cursory exposure to many different fields.
This was reasonable when a small share of the population went to college and it was not too expensive, but as more people pursued higher education and costs rose, the expectation changed. Students wanted a more vocational and career-focused education, and were less interested in reading Plato.
Meanwhile, colleges and universities stopped doing either job well. Many students struggle to apply their degree to the job market, and the education they receive has become less rigorous.
One study found little improvement in critical-thinking skills during the first few years among 45 percent of students.
It is understandable the people want a clearer path to a career from their degrees, but treating college strictly as vocational education limits students’ skills. Now that critical and creative-thinking skills are even more essential, US schools should embrace and improve on their original mission that aims to produce well-rounded thinkers.
There are ways to make any college major more practical or to integrate the humanities, says Preston Cooper, a fellow at the Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity who has researched the value of degrees.
For instance, high-return degrees such as nursing could include more liberal arts classes. More traditional humanities majors, such as history, could include marketing and communications courses. This would impart hard skills and broader thinking ability, and students would enter the labor force more employable and adaptable.
In the short run, it is up to students to challenge themselves and take the initiative to make their college education more AI-proof. They need to seek out the classes that make them think more rigorously, including math, and probability and statistics. Then balance those with humanities where they learn history and how to write well.
AI might do more writing for us in the future, but knowing how to write well helps clarify and organize your thoughts.
Students should develop a reading list that allows them to explore the great minds of the past and contemplate how to apply their insights to current times.
Here are a few recommendations to start with: Plato’s The Republic — the best book on the nature of education and its relationship to politics; Machiavelli’s The Prince — on how to master fortune as far as humanly possible; Abraham Lincoln’s greatest speeches — statesmanship at the highest level; Hannah Arendt’s The Origins of Totalitarianism — perspectives on how to respond to efforts to dehumanize; and Roderick Floud’s and Deirdre McCloskey’s Economic History of Britain — how does a market come into being and change the world?
Face it, harder classes mean a lot more work and might mean worse grades, but it would be the best insurance students can get from whatever change technology is going to be throwing at them.
This is how they can get greater value from their degree — and in the new economy it will be more valuable than ever. The sooner they get started the better.
Allison Schrager is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering economics and a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion
of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS