Cross-strait relations are tangled with history and ideologies. Despite 70 years of confrontation, Taiwan has become a mature democratic country, while China has remained a one-party authoritarian state. Faced with the new international situation that is the dispute between China and the US, Taiwanese need to develop a new way of thinking regarding some aspects of cross-strait ties.
Veterans Affairs Council Minister Feng Shih-kuan (馮世寬) at a news conference called on veterans’ groups not to join China’s celebrations for the Whampoa Military Academy’s 99th anniversary in June to avoid falling into Beijing’s “united front” traps. Feng also expressed his hope that, at a difficult time like this, veterans’ groups would support the academy’s grand centennial celebrations in Taiwan next year.
Veterans Affairs Council Deputy Minister Lee Wen-chung (李文忠) said that since 1950 when the academy relocated to Taiwan, its legitimacy has been bound to its existence here. Veterans’ groups should be cautious about traveling to China as they might be duped by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), he said.
On a practical level, Taiwan has every right to claim Whampoa after reopening the academy more than 70 years ago. Regardless of the number of times political power has transferred in Taiwan or the transformation from an authoritarian system to a democratic one, the Republic of China (ROC) military defends Taiwan proper, and Penghu, Kinmem and Lienchiang counties, not China.
Considering the national identity of the ROC, it would be inappropriate for groups to join the CCP’s Whampoa celebrations.
Since 2017, the CCP’s military aircraft have repeatedly intruded into the air defense identification zone southwest of Taiwan, while its warplanes and warships have crossed the median line of the Taiwan Strait. Taiwan’s air force and naval personnel take turns on alert missions.
The situation has added a lot of pressure on military personnel. Despite the hardships, the ROC military has always adhered to its principles, continuing to carry out missions and issuing radio alerts to drive Chinese warplanes and ships away.
Retired officers who insist on going to China for the Whampoa event would be an embarrassment for the nation’s active military personnel.
The CCP’s “united front” technique is based on the principle of creating disunity among its enemies, with “enemies” categorized as primary or secondary.
From the CCP’s perspective, Taiwan’s active and retired military personnel — whether they are members of the pan-blue or pan-green political camps — are targets of its “united front” work. This has been the CCP’s tactic for a long time.
The government’s call for retired military personnel not to go to China for the anniversary is justified.
Feng’s heartfelt remarks and Lee’s appeal should be taken seriously. Veteran officers, regardless of party affiliation or stance on the cross-strait issue, should stay in Taiwan for next year’s Whampoa celebrations. They should not allow China to disunite Taiwan through its “united front” work.
Ray Song is a doctoral student in Tamkang University’s Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
Despite calls to the contrary from their respective powerful neighbors, Taiwan and Somaliland continue to expand their relationship, endowing it with important new prospects. Fitting into this bigger picture is the historic Coast Guard Cooperation Agreement signed last month. The common goal is to move the already strong bilateral relationship toward operational cooperation, with significant and tangible mutual benefits to be observed. Essentially, the new agreement commits the parties to a course of conduct that is expressed in three fundamental activities: cooperation, intelligence sharing and technology transfer. This reflects the desire — shared by both nations — to achieve strategic results within
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether
RSS