The decision to shift the potential meeting between President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and US House of Representatives Speaker Kevin McCarthy to California to avoid Beijing’s wrath is a geopolitical mistake that would further embolden China, and weaken Taiwan and the West’s resolve and principled deterrence. It makes Taiwan and the US look weak and all too willing to kowtow to Beijing’s threat of force, and sends the wrong message to the Asia-Pacific region.
The West and other regional and global players must deepen their collective stance, condemnation and deterrence against Beijing’s continuous bullying and coercion of Taiwan.
China cannot be allowed to use force or threats of force and intimidation as a means of blackmail. This will only strengthen its institutionalized approach in dealing with Taiwan and reinforcing its regional hegemonic claim by combining its integrated approach of further punishing and cornering Taiwan.
Its daily aggression and intimidation of Taiwan has become normalized and institutionalized. Its next step would be to further test responses by harping on about every Taiwanese move with Western powers as pretexts for further aggression.
Beijing will increase its hard power measures regardless of the visit. The Chinese Communist Party and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) want to take Taiwan regardless of the cost, even at Beijing’s long-term economic expense.
Pledges of peaceful unification are not enough, as the fundamental core question remains on the future of Taiwan’s democratic ideals and culture of freedom and human rights. These would need more than mere verbal intent or assurances alone, nor would the suggested Hong Kong model of autonomy and separate governance work.
Beijing’s “united front” tactics and soft power narratives, along with downright hard power intimidation, will backfire in the long term. Taiwanese, regardless of party affiliation, still prefer the “status quo” and peace, but will not surrender their system of freedom and democracy to Beijing.
Regardless of the extent of Beijing’s push to change that orientation, which can be expected to grow this year ahead of the presidential election next year, the sentiment on the ground remains unchanged, despite Beijing claiming otherwise after the recent momentum of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
Even if the KMT delivers an upset in next year’s presidential election, fundamental principles would not alter and it would only serve to delay the inevitable. The question remains: Who has the bigger power advantage in the race against time for eventual unification?
Beijing is realizing the gravity of its own time trap, as internal decline and structural demise signals the beginning of the end of its resilience.
Xi wants Taiwan as his most important legacy, so time is definitely not on his side, and therefore not on Taiwan’s side. The rest of the democratic world and the alliance of free nations must stand in solidarity with Taiwan now more than ever.
Collins Chong Yew Keat provides analysis and opinion to international media on contemporary global and regional issues.
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs spokesman for maritime affairs Rogelio Villanueva on Monday said that Manila’s claims in the South China Sea are backed by international law. Villanueva was responding to a social media post by the Chinese embassy alleging that a former Philippine ambassador in 1990 had written a letter to a German radio operator stating that the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島) did not fall within Manila’s territory. “Sovereignty is not merely claimed, it is exercised,” Villanueva said. The Philippines won a landmark case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016 that found China’s sweeping claim of sovereignty in
RSS