Amid the dispute between Taiwan and China over the Whampoa Military Academy, which has been renamed the Republic of China (ROC) Military Academy in Taiwan, former minister of national defense Kao Hua-chu (高華柱) made an intriguing comment, saying: “The temple is with them, god is with us.”
The “temple” refers to Whampoa Island in China’s Guangzhou Province, where the academy was founded, and “god” refers to the ROC Military Academy in Kaohsiung’s Fengshan District (鳳山).
The spirit of Whampoa is the “orthodoxy” formed by each academy president from the first, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), to the 32nd, Hou Chia-lun (侯家倫), along with its teachers and students.
The core value of the orthodoxy is to “safeguard the ROC and protect the ROC Constitution,” and all Whampoa graduates should strive for sacrifice, unity, and love for the country and its people.
The academy has been relocated several times. Founded in 1924, it moved from Guangzhou to what was then the Chinese capital, Nanjing, three years later and to Chengdu in 1937 due to the Japanese invasion.
In 1950, it moved to Fengshan after Chengdu fell into the hands of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government relocated to Taiwan.
The majority of the more than 1,000 graduates of the 23rd class — the last Whampoa class in China — either died in battles on their way to western China or died defending Chiang as he departed from Chengdu Lantau Peak Airport for Taiwan in 1949.
The school was in China for only 26 of its 99 years, but it has been in Taiwan for almost 73 years.
The spirit of Whampoa has long been internalized locally, so it is no longer appropriate to confine the debate to unnecessary arguments over which place the spirit should be named after.
The call to erase “Whampoa” from the spirit would be a redundant move — just as redundant as the call to rename the ROC Air Force Academy’s “spirit of Jianqiao” the “spirit of Gangshan” after its location in Kaohsiung’s Gangshan District (岡山), as well as renaming National Defense University Fuhsingkang College’s spirit of Fuhsingkang the “spirit of Beitou (北投),” to reflect its home in the Taipei district.
Would the quality and quantity of the ROC Military Academy’s enrollment surge to the level of National Taiwan University or other prestigious institutions next year if it were to rename its spirit of Whampoa?
More than 90 percent of graduates of the 23rd Whampoa class and those who went before them have been reunited in heaven, not to mention the earliest graduates from the first six classes during the KMT-CCP First United Front in the 1920s.
Former army general Hsu Li-nung (許歷農), a graduate of the 16th class who is now 104 years old, is perhaps the only alumnus in Taiwan who attended the academy in China, while most remaining alumni in China did not fight side by side with the KMT against the Japanese.
Besides, historical data show that there were 22 major battles during the Japanese invasion, but the CCP did not participate in them.
If retired military officers from Taiwan were to take part in the academy’s 99th anniversary celebrations in China, what shared topics would the Taiwanese and Chinese alumini have except those represented by visiting the original Whampoa site?
Liao Nien-han is a lecturer at the ROC Military Academy.
Translated by Eddy Chang
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
RSS