Control Yuan members Tsai Chung-yi (蔡崇義) and Fan Sun-lu (范巽綠) on Feb. 24 released a report on the 1980 murders of family members of political activist Lin I-hsiung (林義雄).
Intelligence agencies of the then-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government, spearheaded by the now-defunct Taiwan Garrison Command, interfered with the investigation of the case, the report said.
Even though the report does not have a definite conclusion, the two Control Yuan members examined the case thoroughly and believe that the investigation should continue. The Executive Yuan should make sure it does.
On Feb. 28, 1980, the killer broke into Lin’s house, where they fatally stabbed his 60-year-old mother, Lin Yu A-mei (林游阿妹), and his seven-year-old twin daughters, Lin Ting-chun (林亭均) and Lin Liang-chun (林亮均). Lin I-hsiung’s eldest daughter, Lin Huan-chun (林奐均), nine years old at the time, was severely injured. What kind of tremendous cruelty did it take for somebody to carry out these brutal crimes?
The report says that KMT intelligence agencies such as the Taiwan Garrison Command and the National Security Bureau not only intervened in the investigation, but also covered up the crime, misleading the media and the public.
The bureau’s 307 task force assigned to the case destroyed important evidence, which it would not have dared do had it not been instructed to do so from someone high up. From the outset, the KMT interfered with the investigation, and even now, more than 40 years later, the truth is still being withheld.
It is regrettable that intelligence agencies in this country were complicit in hindering a murder investigation. When China-born US writer Henry Liu (劉宜良) — whose pen name was Chiang Nan (江南) — was assassinated by KMT agents in the US, the country’s intelligence agencies solved the case as quickly as they could.
This raises suspicion that the KMT’s agents were actually behind the murders of Lin I-hsiung’s family members, too. If so, the investigation would be futile, for it would demand that the perpetrator arrest the perpetrator. This is also why the report released by the Control Yuan members lacks a definite conclusion and why the investigation must continue.
Taiwanese can at times be too credulous. It was not a coincidence that the Lin family murders took place on Feb. 28. The message of intimidation could not have been clearer. Lin I-hsiung has every right to demand the truth. He should be the first person to know who killed his mother and daughters, and who else was behind the killings. It is also the duty and responsibility of all Taiwanese to demand that the truth be uncovered. The cruelty of the authoritarian era should not be concealed and past mistakes should not be repeated.
Even though the Executive Yuan and the Legislative Yuan have been run by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for seven years, the DPP has failed to invest adequate resources and state power to solve the Lin case.
The Control Yuan members could only bring their unfinished report to a temporary conclusion. It is their means of forcing the Executive Yuan to devote more resources to the case. Their report was in fact a subtle protest.
Without the truth, it is impossible to achieve peace. As former South African archbishop Desmond Tutu believed, even when we are overwhelmed by evil, we must open the wounds and clean them.
The DPP government can no longer remain weak. When dealing with the 228 Incident in 1947 and the murders of Lin’s family on the same date in 1980, the DPP must commit itself to finding the truth. The DPP and Taiwanese should not tolerate evildoers sheltered by the administrations of authoritarian-era presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國).
They must face the past seriously and carry out transitional justice earnestly. Only in so doing can Taiwan stride confidently toward the future.
Twu Shiing-jer is a former Chiayi mayor and former national policy adviser.
Translated by Liu Yi-hung
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS