Former Chinese State Administration for Religious Affairs director Ye Xiaowen (葉小文) applied to enter Taiwan on the pretext of offering his condolences over the death of Buddhist master Hsing Yun (星雲法師). Ye’s application was rejected by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC), a decision applauded by a group of lawyers representing the Falun Gong.
The government’s move to bar Ye from visiting Taiwan is “absolutely legitimate and reasonable,” as Ye has been involved in genocide and “crimes against humanity,” the group said in a statement.
Denying Ye entry is in accordance with the nation’s democratic policy of upholding human rights, the statement said.
The council’s decision prevented a situation that could have turned into an international legal and political incident.
On Jan. 19, 2005, the World Organization to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong released a list of Chinese Communist Party officials and its network of enforcers: Ye was one of them.
The organization said that the US’ Anti-Atrocity Alien Deportation Act states that the names of these criminals are to be submitted to the customs and immigration offices of all countries.
Under international law, the crimes against humanity and religious persecution committed by Ye fall under the principle of universal jurisdiction. In other words, all democratic countries and their national courts should exercise the authority to investigate and prosecute Ye’s “crimes against humanity.”
Although Taiwan did not cite the principle of universal jurisdiction to scrutinize Ye’s case, prosecutors can and should investigate crimes against humanity and religious persecution, as required by the Convention on the Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (殘害人群治罪條例).
People involved in genocide, defined in Article 2 of the convention as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group,” are to be sentenced to death, life imprisonment or more than seven years in prison. Ye’s “crimes against humanity” are considered a capital felony. Hence, should he enter Taiwan, he would be arrested and prosecuted.
It is fortunate that the MAC discovered Ye’s intention to visit Taiwan and barred him from doing so. The council prevented the nation from a major dilemma of tracking down criminals while dealing with international political problems.
Huang Di-ying is an attorney.
Translated by Liu Yi-hung
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
Taiwan-India relations appear to have been put on the back burner this year, including on Taiwan’s side. Geopolitical pressures have compelled both countries to recalibrate their priorities, even as their core security challenges remain unchanged. However, what is striking is the visible decline in the attention India once received from Taiwan. The absence of the annual Diwali celebrations for the Indian community and the lack of a commemoration marking the 30-year anniversary of the representative offices, the India Taipei Association and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center, speak volumes and raise serious questions about whether Taiwan still has a coherent India
Recent media reports have again warned that traditional Chinese medicine pharmacies are disappearing and might vanish altogether within the next 15 years. Yet viewed through the broader lens of social and economic change, the rise and fall — or transformation — of industries is rarely the result of a single factor, nor is it inherently negative. Taiwan itself offers a clear parallel. Once renowned globally for manufacturing, it is now best known for its high-tech industries. Along the way, some businesses successfully transformed, while others disappeared. These shifts, painful as they might be for those directly affected, have not necessarily harmed society
Legislators of the opposition parties, consisting of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Friday moved to initiate impeachment proceedings against President William Lai (賴清德). They accused Lai of undermining the nation’s constitutional order and democracy. For anyone who has been paying attention to the actions of the KMT and the TPP in the legislature since they gained a combined majority in February last year, pushing through constitutionally dubious legislation, defunding the Control Yuan and ensuring that the Constitutional Court is unable to operate properly, such an accusation borders the absurd. That they are basing this