Taiwan must improve its war preparations, and strengthen its ability to survive the first 70 days of a war without aid from other countries, a defense researcher said last week.
The nation needs to bolster its inventory of stocks that it would need during war, as it would likely face a blockade and be unable to receive supplies, Institute of National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Wang Ting-yu (王定宇) agreed, saying that Taiwan must acquire all the supplies and equipment it needs before a war. He added that the nation must acquire more precision weapons, and learn to use its existing weapons systems more effectively.
The government is working toward these, as evidenced by Taiwan Power Co’s plans to increase its coal stock to 50 days, the military’s plans to boost missile defenses along the east coast, and the Ministry of National Defense’s plans to procure 3,000 domestically produced drones, as well as 100AIM-X Block II Sidewinder tactical missiles from the US.
These moves, along with extending conscription terms, are a step in the right direction, but some of the long-term plans should be sped up, as experts have predicted that China might attempt to invade Taiwan as soon as 2027. Developments in Taiwan must keep pace with those in China to serve as a real deterrent. Taiwan must communicate this urgency to Washington to accelerate training efforts and arms deliveries.
There are also civil defense issues that need to be addressed.
“The more we look into our civil defense preparedness, the less we feel confident of the readiness of Taiwanese,” Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Lin Ching-yi (林靜儀) said last month.
Chang Li-ming (張離明), who heads the Taiwan National Security Institute’s civil defense project, said that the civil defense system was being held back by more than a lack of training, and Taiwan Statebuilding Party Taipei chapter head Wu Hsin-tai (吳欣岱) said that only a small amount of the funding allocated by local governments for civil defense is devoted to training, with most going to social activities.
It is also unclear whether Taiwanese would have the will or the training to fight in the event of a Chinese invasion. A key reason that Ukraine has been so successful in resisting the Russian invasion is that ordinary Ukrainians are willing to fight.
Achieving similar results in Taiwan will require greater efforts to foster a national consciousness, and improve awareness of the enemy. This is being hampered by China’s disinformation campaign, and by meetings between lawmakers from Taiwan’s main opposition party and Chinese officials.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators had accused the Democratic Progressive Party government of trying to “desinicize” the national curriculum. Teaching Mandarin, classical Chinese literature or Chinese history should not be a problem, but educators should draw a clear distinction from the politics of the People’s Republic of China and emphasize that the Chinese Communist Party does not represent Taiwan or Taiwanese,
While meeting with a delegation from Stanford University’s Hoover Institution at the Presidential Office in August last year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that Taiwan had the resolve to defend its sovereignty.
That resolve is the crux of the matter, because without the will to fight, even the most advanced weapons will be of no use, and if Taiwanese are not willing to defend themselves, other countries are not likely to provide assistance.
The government must clearly communicate to the public that China cannot be reasoned with on the issue of Taiwanese sovereignty, and if Taiwanese do not wish to be annexed by China, they must be willing and prepared to fight.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS