Taiwan must improve its war preparations, and strengthen its ability to survive the first 70 days of a war without aid from other countries, a defense researcher said last week.
The nation needs to bolster its inventory of stocks that it would need during war, as it would likely face a blockade and be unable to receive supplies, Institute of National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Wang Ting-yu (王定宇) agreed, saying that Taiwan must acquire all the supplies and equipment it needs before a war. He added that the nation must acquire more precision weapons, and learn to use its existing weapons systems more effectively.
The government is working toward these, as evidenced by Taiwan Power Co’s plans to increase its coal stock to 50 days, the military’s plans to boost missile defenses along the east coast, and the Ministry of National Defense’s plans to procure 3,000 domestically produced drones, as well as 100AIM-X Block II Sidewinder tactical missiles from the US.
These moves, along with extending conscription terms, are a step in the right direction, but some of the long-term plans should be sped up, as experts have predicted that China might attempt to invade Taiwan as soon as 2027. Developments in Taiwan must keep pace with those in China to serve as a real deterrent. Taiwan must communicate this urgency to Washington to accelerate training efforts and arms deliveries.
There are also civil defense issues that need to be addressed.
“The more we look into our civil defense preparedness, the less we feel confident of the readiness of Taiwanese,” Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Lin Ching-yi (林靜儀) said last month.
Chang Li-ming (張離明), who heads the Taiwan National Security Institute’s civil defense project, said that the civil defense system was being held back by more than a lack of training, and Taiwan Statebuilding Party Taipei chapter head Wu Hsin-tai (吳欣岱) said that only a small amount of the funding allocated by local governments for civil defense is devoted to training, with most going to social activities.
It is also unclear whether Taiwanese would have the will or the training to fight in the event of a Chinese invasion. A key reason that Ukraine has been so successful in resisting the Russian invasion is that ordinary Ukrainians are willing to fight.
Achieving similar results in Taiwan will require greater efforts to foster a national consciousness, and improve awareness of the enemy. This is being hampered by China’s disinformation campaign, and by meetings between lawmakers from Taiwan’s main opposition party and Chinese officials.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators had accused the Democratic Progressive Party government of trying to “desinicize” the national curriculum. Teaching Mandarin, classical Chinese literature or Chinese history should not be a problem, but educators should draw a clear distinction from the politics of the People’s Republic of China and emphasize that the Chinese Communist Party does not represent Taiwan or Taiwanese,
While meeting with a delegation from Stanford University’s Hoover Institution at the Presidential Office in August last year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that Taiwan had the resolve to defend its sovereignty.
That resolve is the crux of the matter, because without the will to fight, even the most advanced weapons will be of no use, and if Taiwanese are not willing to defend themselves, other countries are not likely to provide assistance.
The government must clearly communicate to the public that China cannot be reasoned with on the issue of Taiwanese sovereignty, and if Taiwanese do not wish to be annexed by China, they must be willing and prepared to fight.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS