Taiwan must improve its war preparations, and strengthen its ability to survive the first 70 days of a war without aid from other countries, a defense researcher said last week.
The nation needs to bolster its inventory of stocks that it would need during war, as it would likely face a blockade and be unable to receive supplies, Institute of National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Wang Ting-yu (王定宇) agreed, saying that Taiwan must acquire all the supplies and equipment it needs before a war. He added that the nation must acquire more precision weapons, and learn to use its existing weapons systems more effectively.
The government is working toward these, as evidenced by Taiwan Power Co’s plans to increase its coal stock to 50 days, the military’s plans to boost missile defenses along the east coast, and the Ministry of National Defense’s plans to procure 3,000 domestically produced drones, as well as 100AIM-X Block II Sidewinder tactical missiles from the US.
These moves, along with extending conscription terms, are a step in the right direction, but some of the long-term plans should be sped up, as experts have predicted that China might attempt to invade Taiwan as soon as 2027. Developments in Taiwan must keep pace with those in China to serve as a real deterrent. Taiwan must communicate this urgency to Washington to accelerate training efforts and arms deliveries.
There are also civil defense issues that need to be addressed.
“The more we look into our civil defense preparedness, the less we feel confident of the readiness of Taiwanese,” Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Lin Ching-yi (林靜儀) said last month.
Chang Li-ming (張離明), who heads the Taiwan National Security Institute’s civil defense project, said that the civil defense system was being held back by more than a lack of training, and Taiwan Statebuilding Party Taipei chapter head Wu Hsin-tai (吳欣岱) said that only a small amount of the funding allocated by local governments for civil defense is devoted to training, with most going to social activities.
It is also unclear whether Taiwanese would have the will or the training to fight in the event of a Chinese invasion. A key reason that Ukraine has been so successful in resisting the Russian invasion is that ordinary Ukrainians are willing to fight.
Achieving similar results in Taiwan will require greater efforts to foster a national consciousness, and improve awareness of the enemy. This is being hampered by China’s disinformation campaign, and by meetings between lawmakers from Taiwan’s main opposition party and Chinese officials.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators had accused the Democratic Progressive Party government of trying to “desinicize” the national curriculum. Teaching Mandarin, classical Chinese literature or Chinese history should not be a problem, but educators should draw a clear distinction from the politics of the People’s Republic of China and emphasize that the Chinese Communist Party does not represent Taiwan or Taiwanese,
While meeting with a delegation from Stanford University’s Hoover Institution at the Presidential Office in August last year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that Taiwan had the resolve to defend its sovereignty.
That resolve is the crux of the matter, because without the will to fight, even the most advanced weapons will be of no use, and if Taiwanese are not willing to defend themselves, other countries are not likely to provide assistance.
The government must clearly communicate to the public that China cannot be reasoned with on the issue of Taiwanese sovereignty, and if Taiwanese do not wish to be annexed by China, they must be willing and prepared to fight.
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
RSS