One is a pistol-packing ex-member of an outlawed Jewish militant group. The other is a religious fundamentalist who once called himself a “proud homophobe.” Both are West Bank settlers averse to Palestinians’ self-rule — let alone their hopes of statehood.
As senior coalition partners to re-elected Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich would be within reach of the levers of power — a troubling prospect for Israel’s once-dominant secular-left and friends in the West.
Netanyahu turned to the ultra-nationalists after centrist parties boycotted him over his long-running corruption trial. He needs their support to stay in office as he argues his innocence in court, but denies that this spells pliability to their demands.
“I will navigate this government. The other parties are joining me. I’m not joining them,” Netanyahu told the Arabic TV news channel Al Arabiya last month, pledging to enforce “liberal rightist” policymaking.
Besides, “a lot of them have changed and moderated their views, principally because with the assumption of power comes responsibility,” he added.
There might be precedent in Avigdor Lieberman, a firebrand whose 2006 appointment as deputy prime minister triggered much the same response as Ben-Gvir’s rise: liberal warnings of civil war and, on Israel’s top TV satire, his lampooning as a Nazi.
Lieberman proved to be politically adaptable. He served in various coalitions — one of which included an Islamist party — and ended up in the current opposition, from which he has scorned Netanyahu’s new allies as “zealots and extremists.”
Still, Lieberman could also play spoiler from the right. As Netanyahu’s foreign minister in a previous government, he would publicly promote a harder line on the Palestinians than the premier’s. In a later term, Lieberman resigned as Netanyahu’s defense minister in protest at a Gaza truce he deemed too lax.
Netanyahu’s conservative Likud party has now retained the defense and foreign ministries, but the optics around Ben-Gvir and Smotrich might yet prove combustible for him. For example, if either man visits or prays at Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, an icon of Palestinian nationalism which is also the holiest site for Judaism as vestige of its two ancient temples.
Netanyahu’s previous 15 years as premier saw him feathering the nests of the hawks in his Cabinet — or clipping their wings — as he deemed necessary. Back then, he had parties to his left to help him function as an ideological fulcrum.
“With all the parties in the incoming government situated to Netanyahu’s right, it will be difficult for him to replicate that role this time,” said Yohanan Plesner, president of the Israel Democracy Institute think-tank. “Does he want to?”
On Ben-Gvir’s and Smotrich’s calls for West Bank annexations, Netanyahu is on record as being in favor, while also avoiding action on the ground that would risk escalating into confrontations with Washington or Arab partners.
Yet Smotrich did carve out a Cabinet niche for himself overseeing settlements, which most world powers deem illegal for taking occupied land that Palestinians want for a state.
“He can be effective in multiplying and consolidating Israel’s presence in the West Bank,” said Amotz Asa-El, research fellow at the Shalom Hartman Institute, adding that Smotrich’s high pace of infrastructure-building as a former transportation minister.
For Ben-Gvir, by contrast, this is the first stint in government. As national security minister, he would focus on law-and-order issues important to a swathe of Israelis, including crime-hit Arabs against whom Ben-Gvir once agitated, Asa-El said.
“After legitimating his position in broader Israeli circles, he will proceed to the realms that not all agree on — namely the West Bank,” Asa-El said.
That might have to wait, as Ben-Gvir’s portfolio does not grant major powers in the West Bank, which is under the overall control of the military.
Arguably, Ben-Gvir, 46, and Smotrich, 42, can afford to shelve some of their agendas for this round with Netanyahu, 73.
“But that’s counting on restraint from people who come from very different ideological world-views than what we’ve seen in Israeli governments before,” said Daniel Shapiro, a former US envoy to Israel and now Atlantic Council distinguished fellow.
Ben-Gvir came up through the Kahane Chai group, which is blacklisted in Israel and the US for its virulently anti-Arab doctrines. Smotrich’s advocacy of Jewish claims on the West Bank is informed by a doctrinaire faith in Bible prophesy.
Earlier generations of Israeli far-rightists in government “demonstrated an interest and capacity to engage in a genuine two-way dialogue with the United States and other international players, and seemed to recognize the limits on pursuing some of their most ideological positions,” Shapiro said.
“It remains to be seen whether that approach will characterize members of the incoming coalition,” he said.
Alan Dershowitz, a prominent American-Jewish jurist who has advised US and Israeli leaders, said that Ben-Gvir and Smotrich disavowed racism and homophobia in meetings with him this month.
“The word ‘balance’ came up a number of times” in their reassurances during the conversations, Dershowitz said.
“Obviously they were in some ways trying to get me to have a positive impression of them,” he said. “Let’s see what happens when I’m not in the room and the people in the room are pushing them to become more extreme. That’s the litmus test.”
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
Last month, two major diplomatic events unfolded in Southeast Asia that suggested subtle shifts in the region’s strategic landscape. The 46th ASEAN Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-Gulf-Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Trilateral Summit in Kuala Lumpur coincided with French President Emmanuel Macron’s high-profile visits to Vietnam, Indonesia and Singapore. Together, they highlighted ASEAN’s maturing global posture, deepening regional integration and China’s intensifying efforts to recalibrate its economic diplomacy amid uncertainties posed by the US. The ASEAN summit took place amid rising protectionist policies from the US, notably sweeping tariffs on goods from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, with duties as high as 49 percent.