In the past few years, the Chinese military threat to Japan has become increasingly serious. Under such circumstances, Japan has acted accordingly, outlining strategic plans for the next five years to expand military budgets, boost defense capabilities and enhance its ability to deter enemies.
On Dec. 16, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s Cabinet approved three key security documents: the National Security Strategy, the National Defense Strategy and the Defense Force Buildup Plan.
According to these documents, Japan is to boost its counterattack capability against “military targets” (eg, an enemy’s missile bases), as well as deploy US-made long-range Tomahawk cruise missiles starting in 2026.
The National Security Strategy is a major turning point in Japanese security policy since the end of World War II. It has made clear that Japan strongly opposes China’s attempts at expansionism that would lead to changes in the “status quo.”
The threat is displayed most clearly by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) frequent military drills in the seas and airspace surrounding Taiwan. The activities not only put Taiwan at risk, but also sound alarm bells in the international community.
The Yomiuri Shimbun reported that while Taiwan has been subjected to China’s intensifying military power, the Japanese government considers Taiwan an important partner and friend who shares its values.
In the past few years, it has become obvious that China has the upper hand over Taiwan in terms of military strength, and Japan would consider an invasion of Taiwan to be a national security threat.
In August last year, after US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi visited Taiwan, China conducted large-scale air and naval military drills around Taiwan while launching missiles into Japan’s exclusive economic zone.
After the drills, then-Japanese minister of defense Nobuo Kishi said in an interview that Japan and Taiwan are close: Okinawa Prefecture’s Yonaguni Island is just 108km from Taiwan.
If China invades Taiwan, Japan would not only be involved, but would probably be used as a “stepping stone” or “spring board” for China’s advancement. It is therefore necessary for Japan to prepare and consult substantively with the US.
In its 2021 Defense of Japan white paper, the Japanese government for the first time officially recognized the significance of Taiwan’s security. It also emphasized that PLA aircraft routinely patrolled around Taiwan, which would affect not only Japan’s safety, but also the stability of the world.
The white paper recommended that Japan enhance its alertness and respond accordingly.
The white paper also said that to promote Japan’s capabilities in multi-domain battle, it would not only bolster its missile defense and extraterritorial defense capabilities, but also build two new Aegis combat system-equipped warships and develop “standoff missiles” that can be launched from a distance.
Meanwhile, Tokyo aims to improve its defense networks in relation to its southwest islands, hoping to deter any Chinese attempts at military expansion.
The approval last month of the three key security documents is a breakthrough for Japan’s armed forces, as it would be able to break away from its defense-oriented principle.
With these revised documents, the Japan Self-Defense Forces would be empowered with autonomy in the use of force. Its participation in joint warfare with allied forces would also be legitimized.
The tensions in the Taiwan Strait have increased. North Korea would continue to launch missile tests, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has not ended. In the face of these events, Japan naturally feels uneasy and insecure.
Acting in line with what former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe said — “a Taiwanese emergency is a Japanese emergency, and therefore an emergency for the Japan-US alliance” — the Japanese government has been deliberating on security in the Strait as seriously as it can.
Yao Chung-yuan is a professor and former deputy director of the Ministry of National Defense’s strategic planning department.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS