In the past few years, the Chinese military threat to Japan has become increasingly serious. Under such circumstances, Japan has acted accordingly, outlining strategic plans for the next five years to expand military budgets, boost defense capabilities and enhance its ability to deter enemies.
On Dec. 16, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s Cabinet approved three key security documents: the National Security Strategy, the National Defense Strategy and the Defense Force Buildup Plan.
According to these documents, Japan is to boost its counterattack capability against “military targets” (eg, an enemy’s missile bases), as well as deploy US-made long-range Tomahawk cruise missiles starting in 2026.
The National Security Strategy is a major turning point in Japanese security policy since the end of World War II. It has made clear that Japan strongly opposes China’s attempts at expansionism that would lead to changes in the “status quo.”
The threat is displayed most clearly by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) frequent military drills in the seas and airspace surrounding Taiwan. The activities not only put Taiwan at risk, but also sound alarm bells in the international community.
The Yomiuri Shimbun reported that while Taiwan has been subjected to China’s intensifying military power, the Japanese government considers Taiwan an important partner and friend who shares its values.
In the past few years, it has become obvious that China has the upper hand over Taiwan in terms of military strength, and Japan would consider an invasion of Taiwan to be a national security threat.
In August last year, after US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi visited Taiwan, China conducted large-scale air and naval military drills around Taiwan while launching missiles into Japan’s exclusive economic zone.
After the drills, then-Japanese minister of defense Nobuo Kishi said in an interview that Japan and Taiwan are close: Okinawa Prefecture’s Yonaguni Island is just 108km from Taiwan.
If China invades Taiwan, Japan would not only be involved, but would probably be used as a “stepping stone” or “spring board” for China’s advancement. It is therefore necessary for Japan to prepare and consult substantively with the US.
In its 2021 Defense of Japan white paper, the Japanese government for the first time officially recognized the significance of Taiwan’s security. It also emphasized that PLA aircraft routinely patrolled around Taiwan, which would affect not only Japan’s safety, but also the stability of the world.
The white paper recommended that Japan enhance its alertness and respond accordingly.
The white paper also said that to promote Japan’s capabilities in multi-domain battle, it would not only bolster its missile defense and extraterritorial defense capabilities, but also build two new Aegis combat system-equipped warships and develop “standoff missiles” that can be launched from a distance.
Meanwhile, Tokyo aims to improve its defense networks in relation to its southwest islands, hoping to deter any Chinese attempts at military expansion.
The approval last month of the three key security documents is a breakthrough for Japan’s armed forces, as it would be able to break away from its defense-oriented principle.
With these revised documents, the Japan Self-Defense Forces would be empowered with autonomy in the use of force. Its participation in joint warfare with allied forces would also be legitimized.
The tensions in the Taiwan Strait have increased. North Korea would continue to launch missile tests, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has not ended. In the face of these events, Japan naturally feels uneasy and insecure.
Acting in line with what former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe said — “a Taiwanese emergency is a Japanese emergency, and therefore an emergency for the Japan-US alliance” — the Japanese government has been deliberating on security in the Strait as seriously as it can.
Yao Chung-yuan is a professor and former deputy director of the Ministry of National Defense’s strategic planning department.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Speaking at the Asia-Pacific Forward Forum in Taipei, former Singaporean minister for foreign affairs George Yeo (楊榮文) proposed a “Chinese commonwealth” as a potential framework for political integration between Taiwan and China. Yeo said the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait is unsustainable and that Taiwan should not be “a piece on the chessboard” in a geopolitical game between China and the US. Yeo’s remark is nothing but an ill-intentioned political maneuver that is made by all pro-China politicians in Singapore. Since when does a Southeast Asian nation have the right to stick its nose in where it is not wanted
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has released a plan to economically integrate China’s Fujian Province with Taiwan’s Kinmen County, outlining a cross-strait development project based on six major themes and 21 measures. This official document by the CCP is directed toward Taiwan’s three outlying island counties: Penghu County, Lienchiang County (Matsu) and Kinmen County. The plan sets out to construct a cohabiting sphere between Kinmen and the nearby Chinese city of Xiamen, as well as between Matsu and Fuzhou. It also aims to bring together Minnanese cultural areas including Taiwan’s Penghu and China’s cities of Quanzhou and Zhangzhou for further integrated
During a recent visit to Taiwan, I encountered repeated questions about “America skepticism” among the body politic. The basic premise of the “America skepticism” theory is that Taiwan people should view the United States as an unreliable, self-interested actor who is using Taiwan for its own purposes. According to this theory, America will abandon Taiwan when its interests are advanced by doing so. At one level, such skepticism is a sign of a healthy, well-functioning democratic society that protects the right for vigorous political debate. Indeed, around the world, the people of Taiwan are far from alone in debating America’s reliability
As China’s economy was meant to drive global economic growth this year, its dramatic slowdown is sounding alarm bells across the world, with economists and experts criticizing Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for his unwillingness or inability to respond to the nation’s myriad mounting crises. The Wall Street Journal reported that investors have been calling on Beijing to take bolder steps to boost output — especially by promoting consumer spending — but Xi has deep-rooted philosophical objections to Western-style consumption-driven growth, seeing it as wasteful and at odds with his goal of making China a world-leading industrial and technological powerhouse, and
RSS