Taiwanese were more financially resilient this year than they were two years ago, a survey released in October by the Taiwan Academy of Banking and Finance (TABF) found. Still, those aged 20 to 29 were the only group that showed a decline in financial resilience, with about 43 percent of young people being close to financial illiteracy, the survey showed.
There are three important findings this year in terms of savings, living expenses and access to financial services in the annual survey, conducted from April to June. First, the COVID-19 pandemic raised awareness of the financial crisis, and more workers have at least six months of income saved than in the previous survey in 2020. Second, there is a marked improvement in people’s overall ability to meet living expenses, and the number of people able to deal with a financial emergency is also higher than it was two years ago.
However, the survey found that more than 40 percent of young people do not have enough knowledge to make essential financial decisions, making them vulnerable to financial fraud and investment scams. This third finding echoes another survey recently released by the Financial Literacy and Education Association, which indicated that nearly half of young people in Taiwan do not have the necessary skills to manage personal finances, budgeting and investing.
Young people’s blind spots regarding financial literacy include wanting to invest without enough savings, spending entire salaries by the end of the month, relying on credit card installment plans to make ends meet and falling into credit repayment traps, while young people also have a weak concept of credit and lack awareness of the consequences of impaired credit, the TABF survey showed.
Furthermore, the survey showed that having insufficient knowledge of financial laws poses another threat to young people, with some being defrauded, while others unintentionally became accomplices to scams. There were 8,207 fraud suspects aged 18 to 23 in Taiwan during the first 10 months of this year, accounting for 21.87 percent of fraud suspects in all age groups, National Police Agency data showed.
As the age of majority — the legal threshold of adulthood — is to drop from 20 to 18 on Jan. 1, as per a 2020 legal amendment, a larger cohort of younger people, at a younger age, will be able to apply for credit cards by themselves and sign business contracts independently. At the same time, they must also be responsible for their behavior under the Civil Code and Criminal Code. This means that financial education is urgently required for young people.
Although sections of the Ministry of Education’s 12-year compulsory “108” curriculum are intended to cultivate financial literacy, most teachers polled said that they face difficulties guiding students in this area, given their own lack of knowledge and teaching experience in financial matters, along with poorly designed finance courses.
Taiwan could learn from countries such as the US, the UK, Australia and Japan, which have implemented national financial literacy strategies. For example, the Ministry of Education could require senior-high schools and vocational schools to include financial education as a compulsory course. The government could also promote cooperation among academic institutions, financial firms and schools — from elementary to senior-high levels — to prepare teaching materials and offer courses.
Meanwhile, the media have a role to play in reporting financial news responsibly. They should help popularize financial knowledge and related laws with easy-to-understand explanations, so that basic financial knowledge becomes common sense to the public.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then