The US Senate on Thursday passed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, which would not only provide military aid to Taiwan, but implement the Taiwan Fellowship Act to send US federal employees to Taiwan to learn Mandarin and work in government agencies. If US President Joe Biden signs it into law, it would be a milestone regarding the two countries’ partnership as China ramps up its threats against Taiwan and the region.
The act requires the US government to establish a two-year fellowship program to assign primary or mid-level federal employees from executive, legislative or judicial branches, to live in Taiwan, learning Mandarin intensively for one year and working for another year in a Taiwanese administrative department, parliamentary office or approved organization related to the fellow’s expertise. The fellows would be required to continue serving in the US government for at least four years after completing the program, to enhance understanding of Taiwan’s politics, history, culture and related regional issues.
To replace China’s Confucius Institutes in the US, Taipei and Washington in 2020 signed the US-Taiwan Education Initiative to expand scholarships for academics and students, and promote language and culture education. To assist with Taiwan’s self-defense capabilities, US arm sales to Taiwan have increased over the years, while about 3,000 US military officers and 1,500 Taiwanese officers take part in an annual training exchange program.
The Taiwan Fellowship Program is offered to US government employees for a longer period, enabling them to develop a more in-depth understanding of Taiwan’s government and its policymaking process, and to establish relationships with their Taiwanese counterparts. Those fellows could become a vital force in supporting improved Taiwan-US relations. US Senator Ed Markey, a cosponsor of the Taiwan Fellowship Act, said in a statement that the bill would contribute to “creating a stronger, more resilient US-Taiwan partnership.”
The US-Japan Mansfield Fellowship Program, which was launched in 1994 and became the model for the Taiwan Fellowship Program, has produced hundreds of US government employees who have a better understanding of the political, economic and strategic dimensions of the two countries’ relations, facilitating their agencies’ work on Japan-related programs and policies.
One such example is US Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space and Missile Defense John D. Hill, who is a Mansfield program alumnus and was formerly US director for Northeast Asia and senior country director for Japan. He led the US Department of Defense’s management of alliance relationships with Japan and South Korea, and oversaw security policies for the Korean Peninsula.
However, many foreign dignitaries, not just from the US, have studied or worked in Taiwan. They include former Japanese prime minister Ryutaro Hashimoto and former Australian prime minister Kevin Rudd, as well as Prague Mayor Zdenek Hrib, who has been extremely supportive of Taiwan, to the point that he has faced pressure from China.
On the other hand, allowing US or any foreign federal employees to work in government agencies might raise concerns about national security. The government must assign dedicated officials to negotiate and arrange the US fellows’ internships for security reasons, while maximizing potential advances in Taiwan-US relations.
Due to China’s increasing threat to the international community, Taiwan has become a crucial element in maintaining stability and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region and globally. Taipei should consider establishing more fellowship exchange programs with like-minded countries to deepen cultural, political and economic ties.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS