The US Senate on Thursday passed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, which would not only provide military aid to Taiwan, but implement the Taiwan Fellowship Act to send US federal employees to Taiwan to learn Mandarin and work in government agencies. If US President Joe Biden signs it into law, it would be a milestone regarding the two countries’ partnership as China ramps up its threats against Taiwan and the region.
The act requires the US government to establish a two-year fellowship program to assign primary or mid-level federal employees from executive, legislative or judicial branches, to live in Taiwan, learning Mandarin intensively for one year and working for another year in a Taiwanese administrative department, parliamentary office or approved organization related to the fellow’s expertise. The fellows would be required to continue serving in the US government for at least four years after completing the program, to enhance understanding of Taiwan’s politics, history, culture and related regional issues.
To replace China’s Confucius Institutes in the US, Taipei and Washington in 2020 signed the US-Taiwan Education Initiative to expand scholarships for academics and students, and promote language and culture education. To assist with Taiwan’s self-defense capabilities, US arm sales to Taiwan have increased over the years, while about 3,000 US military officers and 1,500 Taiwanese officers take part in an annual training exchange program.
The Taiwan Fellowship Program is offered to US government employees for a longer period, enabling them to develop a more in-depth understanding of Taiwan’s government and its policymaking process, and to establish relationships with their Taiwanese counterparts. Those fellows could become a vital force in supporting improved Taiwan-US relations. US Senator Ed Markey, a cosponsor of the Taiwan Fellowship Act, said in a statement that the bill would contribute to “creating a stronger, more resilient US-Taiwan partnership.”
The US-Japan Mansfield Fellowship Program, which was launched in 1994 and became the model for the Taiwan Fellowship Program, has produced hundreds of US government employees who have a better understanding of the political, economic and strategic dimensions of the two countries’ relations, facilitating their agencies’ work on Japan-related programs and policies.
One such example is US Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Space and Missile Defense John D. Hill, who is a Mansfield program alumnus and was formerly US director for Northeast Asia and senior country director for Japan. He led the US Department of Defense’s management of alliance relationships with Japan and South Korea, and oversaw security policies for the Korean Peninsula.
However, many foreign dignitaries, not just from the US, have studied or worked in Taiwan. They include former Japanese prime minister Ryutaro Hashimoto and former Australian prime minister Kevin Rudd, as well as Prague Mayor Zdenek Hrib, who has been extremely supportive of Taiwan, to the point that he has faced pressure from China.
On the other hand, allowing US or any foreign federal employees to work in government agencies might raise concerns about national security. The government must assign dedicated officials to negotiate and arrange the US fellows’ internships for security reasons, while maximizing potential advances in Taiwan-US relations.
Due to China’s increasing threat to the international community, Taiwan has become a crucial element in maintaining stability and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region and globally. Taipei should consider establishing more fellowship exchange programs with like-minded countries to deepen cultural, political and economic ties.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS