The UN’s COP27 climate conference ended on Nov. 20 with much emphasis on “loss and damage” funding for vulnerable countries hit hard by climate disasters. Its conclusions are not relevant to the climate priorities of Pacific island nations. It is time for Taiwan to work with its Austronesian brothers and sisters in the Pacific, especially through the Austronesian Forum, in calling for significant global climate action.
The reason COP27’s results are not being welcomed in the Pacific region is because Pacific islanders have realized that sea-level rise threatens supplies of fresh water, agricultural sustainability and infrastructure buildup. In a worst-case scenario, some inhabited islands could sink and disappear. The money for compensating “loss and damage” is not going to help their homes survive accelerating sea-level rise.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in her statement at the end of the COP27 that the conference “has opened a new chapter on financing loss and damage.” This is “crucial moving forward, because there can be no lasting action against climate change without climate justice.” COP27 “marks a small step towards climate justice, but much more is needed for the planet.”
Von der Leyen said that “COP27 has kept alive the goal of 1.5°C. Unfortunately, however, it has not delivered on a commitment by the world’s major emitters to phase down fossil fuels, nor new commitments on climate mitigation.”
Pacific leaders launched the development of the 2050 Strategy for the Blue Pacific Continent at the 2019 Pacific Islands Forum and finalized the strategy this summer. They highlighted their concerns for the region’s enduring challenges, which, of course, include climate change-related impacts.
Several climate scenarios were mentioned. For example, by 2050 without new action global greenhouse gas emissions are projected to increase by 50 percent, primarily due to a 70 percent growth in energy-related carbon dioxide emissions. There would be a loss and degradation of land and ocean resources as a result of exceeding 1.5°C warming.
All reefs would be threatened, with more frequent bleaching, lower levels of carbonate and increased cyclonic activity. A 30 percent increase in ocean acidity would affect many ocean — and coastal — species. Sea-level rise is projected to erode coastlines and increase saltwater intrusion.
The Pacific Islands Forum is to be one of the important platforms facilitating the region working together to bring the whole world’s attention to their priorities in climate action.
The Austronesian Forum, which includes Taiwan as a crucial member because many Austronesian people identify with Taiwan’s indigenous cultures, could be a significant platform as well. Taiwan should, through the forum, help its Austronesian brothers and sisters get attention from other parts of the world. While sharing the same goals on climate action, Taiwan can also reaffirm its connections with many Pacific island states.
The government’s commitments to zero carbon policies and Taiwanese enterprises’ realization of the principles of environmental, social and governance goals would help Pacific islanders urge other industrial developed countries to take the same action to tackle the climate crisis together.
In return, teaming up with partners within the Austronesian Forum might extend Taiwan’s climate vision to a global level, and probably open the door for Taiwan to join the UN Climate Change Conference in the near future.
Edward Pingyuan Lu is president of the Guahan Global Foundation and director of HSVG Mission’s Public Health Office.
Taiwan is home to thousands of foreign residents who build careers, families and lives here. However, what happens when one of those residents loses the ability to prove his identity — not because he has broken Taiwan’s laws, but because his own government refuses to renew his passport? That is the situation my husband, Matteo (not his real name), a Nicaraguan national, has found himself in. After about three years of attempts to renew his passport, our future in Taiwan remains uncertain. It all comes back to Taiwan’s giant geopolitical issue: the multitude of countries cutting diplomatic ties with Taiwan
Well, sort of. Tomorrow is the seventy-fifth anniversary of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, signed by forty-nine nations on September 8, 1951. The Republic of China wasn’t one of them. Article 2(b) of the Treaty reads: “Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores.” So, tomorrow would be the Diamond Jubilee of Formosa’s freedom from Japanese sovereignty. As my good friend and former Examination Yuan President Yao Chia-wen (姚嘉文) voiced in these pages last year (“San Francisco treaty should be taught: adviser”, Sept. 7, 2025), the Japan peace treaty should be taught in all Taiwan schools to
A Taiwanese national studying overseas had, for a period of time, submitted regular opinion pieces to the Taipei Times commenting about Taiwanese politics and current affairs. These informed and well-written articles, demonstrating a profound love for the nation, were valuable because they represented a Taiwanese voice who had maintained a deep interest in what was happening in their home country, even as they pursued their studies abroad. For this reason, many were published on this page. Several months ago, this person contacted the Taipei Times and requested that the articles be unpublished. A member of their family was seeking employment
Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) was under constant fire last month over the city government’s questionable public works projects and child protection issues, and last week he sparked another controversy involving his son. Chiang on Monday last week confirmed that his eldest son, who was recently admitted to Taipei Municipal Chien Kuo Senior High School, would take a leave of absence to participate in a year-long exchange program in the US. The exchange program Chiang’s son was selected for is funded by the Taipei City Government, and is limited to 25 spots for eligible junior-high and high-school students. Chiang was accused
RSS