As Taiwan did a good job in curbing the COVID-19 pandemic, most Taiwanese — aside from those were diagnosed with the disease — were free to go to the polling stations on Nov. 26 to vote in the nine-in-one local elections.
In contrast, across the Taiwan Strait, dissatisfaction with the Chinese government’s harsh “zero COVID” policy spawned a “Blank Paper Movement” across the nation. Demonstrators chanted slogans calling for Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to step down. Clamoring for democracy and freedom of speech, some protesters were heard chanting: “Give me liberty, or give me death.”
In Taiwan, these appeals are already the fundamental rights of Taiwanese. If the public is dissatisfied with the government, all it needs to do is to vote the governing party out of office. From the Hong Kong protests to the “Blank Paper” protests on the mainland, it is hard to imagine why any Taiwanese would want to become part of China.
In the run-up to the elections, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) promoted the notion that a vote for the party is to “say no” to war and to extending mandatory military service. Perhaps this is one of the reasons that contributed to the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) defeat.
Some of my friends, who had never voted before, went to the polls this time, bearing in mind former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) claim that “vote for the DPP and our youth will go war.” This will not be the last time we hear this slogan as the nation gears up for the 2024 presidential election.
Since 1949, the CCP has been employing different strategies — from politic to economics, foreign relations and military power — in its bid to annex Taiwan. This is an issue that the KMT, or any political party in Taiwan, must address. Not content with attacking Taiwan’s performance in curbing the COVID-19 pandemic, the opposition resorted to undermining national defense in its desire to the win the elections.
As Chinese philosopher Sun Tzu (孫子) wrote in The Art of War: “The highest form of generalship is to balk the enemy’s plans; the next best is to prevent the junction of the enemy’s forces; the next in order is to attack the enemy’s army in the field; and the worst policy of all is to besiege walled cities.”
Without military prowess, economic power and national defense, Taiwan would not have enough bargaining chips to “balk the enemy’s plans” or even negotiate peace with its enemy.
In the movie Captain Phillips, the mighty US Navy refused to negotiate with the pirates. When the pirates boarded the destroyer, they were immediately arrested. This shows that one can only talk with the enemy when one is powerful enough.
Military service extension should not be equated with war, but as a measure to boost military power, so that Taiwan has enough bargaining chips to deter an invasion. This issue not only concerns the governing party, but all Taiwanese. People should not be confounded by a simple, specious statement like “vote for the DPP and our youth will go to war.”
My generation witnessed the Tiananmen Square Massacre, while young people today have seen the protests in Hong Kong and China.
The election is over, and putting aside all the rhetoric and passion that went with it, Taiwanese still have to face up to the issue of “standing up to China, safeguarding Taiwan.” It is high time for the Taiwanese public to take this issue seriously.
Arthur Chang is a navy reserve lieutenant commander.
Translated by Rita Wang
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS