The Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau and the New Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office recently uncovered misconduct by Kaohsiung news outlet China VTV Co (中華微視公司). The company is being investigated for allegedly having financial connections with China without the approval of the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Investment Commission.
China VTV also allegedly conducted an information campaign by creating videos in line with Chinese propaganda and posting them on social media, aiming to foment social division and mistrust in the government, prosecutors said.
This is nothing short of exhilarating, as it means that the government is finally using legal means to stop pro-China “accomplices” that are promoting Chinese propaganda.
RUMOR MILLS
In the run-up to the 2018 nine-in-one elections, pro-China groups launched a series of information campaigns. From Chinese official media outlets, content farms and video makers in Taiwan, to the dissemination of rumors and fake news on the messaging app Line and Facebook.
The groups — in terms of size, approach and labor division — have shown to be organized and meticulous in running their operations.
As there are bound to be reshuffles in administrative agencies such as the Taiwan Affairs Office of China’s State Council in the wake of the 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party, China’s information warfare against Taiwan has temporarily died down.
Compared with the 2018 elections, there was a sharp decline in the number of rumors, hoaxes and disinformation spread by pro-China groups ahead of the local elections on Saturday.
However, it can be assumed that the powers and the groups behind these campaigns have only temporarily paused their efforts, and when the Chinese Communist Party has need for them, they would reawaken to do its bidding again.
TIP OF THE ICEBERG
China VTV is only the tip of the iceberg, and Taiwan’s police and investigative forces’ mission to crack down on pro-China groups has a long way to go.
As the public and the government are constantly exposed to China’s soft power through books, magazines, movies, TV dramas, mobile games and apps, it has resulted in the public’s lack of vigilance, and the government’s failure to draw up a national strategy to counter the situation.
As a result, many Taiwanese still believe the disinformation and rumors spread by pro-China groups.
UNDER THE INFLUENCE
Children and young people still play cellphone games — or games with Chinese agents — developed in China, or watch TikTok, the international version of Douyin (抖音). Some use the Pinterest-like app Xiaohongshu (also known as Little Red Book) as a cosmetics and fashion guide.
Older people are also vulnerable to disinformation by Chinese content farms, where they turn into “voluntary” accomplices in spreading disinformation to their peers.
RESIST
The public should stiffen the sinews, and start by refusing to share or click on information provided by Chinese content creators. The government should formulate a solid policy to counter China’s subtle influence, with the goal to set down cornerstones for further legislation and amendments to prevent Chinese propaganda from entering Taiwan.
Roger Wu works in the service industry in New Taipei City.
Translated by Rita Wang
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs spokesman for maritime affairs Rogelio Villanueva on Monday said that Manila’s claims in the South China Sea are backed by international law. Villanueva was responding to a social media post by the Chinese embassy alleging that a former Philippine ambassador in 1990 had written a letter to a German radio operator stating that the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島) did not fall within Manila’s territory. “Sovereignty is not merely claimed, it is exercised,” Villanueva said. The Philippines won a landmark case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016 that found China’s sweeping claim of sovereignty in
RSS