On Saturday, at least 156 people were killed and scores more were injured in a stampede at a Halloween celebration in Seoul.
In view of the tragedy, critics are questioning the safety and emergency response plan of the Taipei Dome, a project which has been caught in controversy, and is unfinished due to a halt in construction due to years of legal wrangling. Former Taipei Department of Urban Development commissioner Lin Jou-min (林洲民) posted “An open letter to the Taipei mayoral candidates” on Facebook, revealing that the Taipei City Government has “rigged” the simulation system to pass a security review.
In the letter, Lin explained two glaring loopholes in the dome’s computer simulation and modeling of a disaster scenario. One, regarding emergency exits, showed that the “local familiarity” parameter should have been set to “off” instead of “on,” as most people pay little attention to exit routes when they enter a building. Second, for setting an emergency context, the “impatient” signal should have been set to “on” not “off,” as people usually panic when disaster strikes. Despite the city government’s claims that the dome is safe, they have been made based on manipulated simulations.
In response to the letter, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) said that he has “complete confidence” in the Taipei Dome, but added that the dome would follow standard operating procedures (SOP) and would undergo pressure tests during its trial runs.
Although the dome has a different context to that of Seoul’s Halloween tragedy, the events in South Korea provided an opportunity for Taiwan to conduct a thorough review of its public facilities.
The Taipei Dome needs to be capable of withstanding various disasters, as well as ensuring the safety of its visitors. As the purpose of the computer simulation is to hypothesize worst-case scenarios, to “rig” the system is to overlook extreme possibilities rather than preparing for potential dangers.
As the Taipei Dome has been under construction for a decade and undergone several reviews, this kind of tampering could not have been a mistake, but a deliberate effort to make things easier for the project’s contractor, Farglory Group. Other scandals such as replacing “difficult” review members have shown that the Taipei City Government has been playing with people’s lives, while acting in Farglory’s favor when dealing with bureaucratic frustrations.
Taiwan has seen its fair share of accidents over the past few years. In 2020, a fire broke out at Cashbox Partyworld KTV in Taipei, leaving five dead and 44 injured, which led to the requirement that karaoke venues have fire protection systems. This year, Hsinchu Baseball Stadium was closed indefinitely after complaints that its infield soil was too soft and had caused several injuries during games. Negligence of safety precautions and sloppy reviews can have dire consequences.
Ko, who evaded responsibility by claiming that the government has been “following the SOP,” should stop hiding behind his catchphrase, respond to Lin’s allegations or provide the public with concrete evidence of the dome’s safety.
No one wants to see a replay of the tragedy in South Korea. It is up to the elected Taipei mayor to ensure that the dome meets every requirement before it is officially opened.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Last week, Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) unveiled the location of Nvidia’s new Taipei headquarters and announced plans to build the world’s first large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) supercomputer in Taiwan. In Taipei, Huang’s announcement was welcomed as a milestone for Taiwan’s tech industry. However, beneath the excitement lies a significant question: Can Taiwan’s electricity infrastructure, especially its renewable energy supply, keep up with growing demand from AI chipmaking? Despite its leadership in digital hardware, Taiwan lags behind in renewable energy adoption. Moreover, the electricity grid is already experiencing supply shortages. As Taiwan’s role in AI manufacturing expands, it is critical that
RSS