On Saturday, at least 156 people were killed and scores more were injured in a stampede at a Halloween celebration in Seoul.
In view of the tragedy, critics are questioning the safety and emergency response plan of the Taipei Dome, a project which has been caught in controversy, and is unfinished due to a halt in construction due to years of legal wrangling. Former Taipei Department of Urban Development commissioner Lin Jou-min (林洲民) posted “An open letter to the Taipei mayoral candidates” on Facebook, revealing that the Taipei City Government has “rigged” the simulation system to pass a security review.
In the letter, Lin explained two glaring loopholes in the dome’s computer simulation and modeling of a disaster scenario. One, regarding emergency exits, showed that the “local familiarity” parameter should have been set to “off” instead of “on,” as most people pay little attention to exit routes when they enter a building. Second, for setting an emergency context, the “impatient” signal should have been set to “on” not “off,” as people usually panic when disaster strikes. Despite the city government’s claims that the dome is safe, they have been made based on manipulated simulations.
In response to the letter, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) said that he has “complete confidence” in the Taipei Dome, but added that the dome would follow standard operating procedures (SOP) and would undergo pressure tests during its trial runs.
Although the dome has a different context to that of Seoul’s Halloween tragedy, the events in South Korea provided an opportunity for Taiwan to conduct a thorough review of its public facilities.
The Taipei Dome needs to be capable of withstanding various disasters, as well as ensuring the safety of its visitors. As the purpose of the computer simulation is to hypothesize worst-case scenarios, to “rig” the system is to overlook extreme possibilities rather than preparing for potential dangers.
As the Taipei Dome has been under construction for a decade and undergone several reviews, this kind of tampering could not have been a mistake, but a deliberate effort to make things easier for the project’s contractor, Farglory Group. Other scandals such as replacing “difficult” review members have shown that the Taipei City Government has been playing with people’s lives, while acting in Farglory’s favor when dealing with bureaucratic frustrations.
Taiwan has seen its fair share of accidents over the past few years. In 2020, a fire broke out at Cashbox Partyworld KTV in Taipei, leaving five dead and 44 injured, which led to the requirement that karaoke venues have fire protection systems. This year, Hsinchu Baseball Stadium was closed indefinitely after complaints that its infield soil was too soft and had caused several injuries during games. Negligence of safety precautions and sloppy reviews can have dire consequences.
Ko, who evaded responsibility by claiming that the government has been “following the SOP,” should stop hiding behind his catchphrase, respond to Lin’s allegations or provide the public with concrete evidence of the dome’s safety.
No one wants to see a replay of the tragedy in South Korea. It is up to the elected Taipei mayor to ensure that the dome meets every requirement before it is officially opened.
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
China last week announced that it picked two Pakistani astronauts for its Tiangong space station mission, indicating the maturation of the two nations’ relationship from terrestrial infrastructure cooperation to extraterrestrial strategic domains. For Taiwan and India, the developments present an opportunity for democratic collaboration in space, particularly regarding dual-use technologies and the normative frameworks for outer space governance. Sino-Pakistani space cooperation dates back to the end of the Cold War in the 1990s, with a cooperative agreement between the Pakistani Space & Upper Atmosphere Research Commission, and the Chinese Ministry of Aerospace Industry. Space cooperation was integrated into the China-Pakistan