On Saturday, at least 156 people were killed and scores more were injured in a stampede at a Halloween celebration in Seoul.
In view of the tragedy, critics are questioning the safety and emergency response plan of the Taipei Dome, a project which has been caught in controversy, and is unfinished due to a halt in construction due to years of legal wrangling. Former Taipei Department of Urban Development commissioner Lin Jou-min (林洲民) posted “An open letter to the Taipei mayoral candidates” on Facebook, revealing that the Taipei City Government has “rigged” the simulation system to pass a security review.
In the letter, Lin explained two glaring loopholes in the dome’s computer simulation and modeling of a disaster scenario. One, regarding emergency exits, showed that the “local familiarity” parameter should have been set to “off” instead of “on,” as most people pay little attention to exit routes when they enter a building. Second, for setting an emergency context, the “impatient” signal should have been set to “on” not “off,” as people usually panic when disaster strikes. Despite the city government’s claims that the dome is safe, they have been made based on manipulated simulations.
In response to the letter, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) said that he has “complete confidence” in the Taipei Dome, but added that the dome would follow standard operating procedures (SOP) and would undergo pressure tests during its trial runs.
Although the dome has a different context to that of Seoul’s Halloween tragedy, the events in South Korea provided an opportunity for Taiwan to conduct a thorough review of its public facilities.
The Taipei Dome needs to be capable of withstanding various disasters, as well as ensuring the safety of its visitors. As the purpose of the computer simulation is to hypothesize worst-case scenarios, to “rig” the system is to overlook extreme possibilities rather than preparing for potential dangers.
As the Taipei Dome has been under construction for a decade and undergone several reviews, this kind of tampering could not have been a mistake, but a deliberate effort to make things easier for the project’s contractor, Farglory Group. Other scandals such as replacing “difficult” review members have shown that the Taipei City Government has been playing with people’s lives, while acting in Farglory’s favor when dealing with bureaucratic frustrations.
Taiwan has seen its fair share of accidents over the past few years. In 2020, a fire broke out at Cashbox Partyworld KTV in Taipei, leaving five dead and 44 injured, which led to the requirement that karaoke venues have fire protection systems. This year, Hsinchu Baseball Stadium was closed indefinitely after complaints that its infield soil was too soft and had caused several injuries during games. Negligence of safety precautions and sloppy reviews can have dire consequences.
Ko, who evaded responsibility by claiming that the government has been “following the SOP,” should stop hiding behind his catchphrase, respond to Lin’s allegations or provide the public with concrete evidence of the dome’s safety.
No one wants to see a replay of the tragedy in South Korea. It is up to the elected Taipei mayor to ensure that the dome meets every requirement before it is officially opened.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS