Under the government’s COVID-19 quarantine policy, confirmed cases are not allowed to leave their residences, which would make voting impossible for people with COVID-19.
The average daily caseload last week was more than 39,000, down 25 percent from the same period the previous week. The Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) has predicted that confirmed COVID-19 cases could drop to about 20,000 a day in a week or two. By the time of the local elections next month, there might be about 200,000 confirmed cases unable to cast their ballots due to a requirement to quarantine at home.
“Regardless of whether you test positive for COVID-19 or are obligated to isolate at home, you can vote in polling stations as long as you are legally allowed to go outside,” Central Election Commission Chairman Lee Chin-yung (李進勇) said on Monday.
However, as the CECC is acting in accordance with the Communicable Disease Control Act (傳染病防治法), the movement of confirmed cases is still restricted, meaning they are prohibited from leaving their homes to exercise their voting rights.
I was crestfallen to discover that the commission has not tried to fix the problem, while other countries have found ways to allow people with COVID-19 to vote in elections.
South Korea adopted mail-in voting and extended the voting hours, so confirmed cases could enter polling stations in the evening, separate from other voters.
In Japan, after confirmed cases apply to vote by mail at least four days before the election, they receive a return envelope and a ballot.
Many US states have a long history of allowing voters to cast their ballots by mail, helping confirmed cases to vote.
In Australia, anyone who tests positive is eligible to use a telephone service to vote, while in the UK, confirmed cases can apply for an emergency proxy vote.
The Singaporean government set up special polling stations for those in home isolation to use.
Democracies around the globe have strived to protect every eligible citizen’s fundamental right to vote.
During the Martial Law era from 1949 to 1987, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was notorious for rigging elections. Taiwanese back then regarded voting as something of an exercise in futility, which could explain why citizens and officials have long overlooked the importance of voter enfranchisement.
Now that there is bipartisan consensus on lowering the voting age to broaden civic participation, the government should take corresponding measures to set up channels for COVID-19 cases to exercise their voting rights.
As many countries have lifted COVID-19 restrictions and bans, perhaps the CECC could temporarily lift restrictions on election day, or the legislature could amend the Special Act for Prevention, Relief and Revitalization Measures for Severe Pneumonia with Novel Pathogens (嚴重特殊傳染性肺炎防治及紓困振興特別條例) to exclude those that have been infected with certain variants of SARS-CoV-2.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is unwise to “go the extra mile” with his “zero COVID-19” strategy to consolidate his political authority. In Taiwan, a country that celebrates democratic values, the government should consider and ensure the voting rights of 200,000 citizens. It is time for the CECC and the Central Election Commission to come together and fix voting problems before the local elections.
Lai Yu-che is a retired professor and a farmer in Hualien.
Translated by Rita Wang
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS