Heavy rain brought by Typhoon Nesat over the weekend left a trail of destroyed property in northern Taiwan. Losses from natural disasters are expected, but the circumstances that led to vehicles being swamped after floodgates near Bailing Bridge (百齡橋) in Taipei’s Shilin District (士林) were closed have prompted criticism.
Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) called for improvements to integrated warning and public messaging systems, but added: “Each citizen should take responsibility for their own behavior” when asked why vehicles had not been moved after warning messages were sent.
City councilors and legislators said that owners of the vehicles had not been notified early enough, while about a dozen workers at a canceled music festival were on the riverside when the floodgates were closed.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Michelle Lin (林楚茵) said that the Taipei City Government only messaged the vehicle owners via Line on Sunday after the floodgates were shut at 4pm. Others said that there was a message at 3:55pm, which would still have been too late.
New Power Party Taipei City Councilor Meredith Huang (黃郁芬) on Monday wrote online that the festival contractors only received a message after the gates were shut.
However, Ko said that the city’s Parking Management and Development Office had sent four text messages to vehicle owners, with the first on Sunday morning, and that the Hydraulic Engineering Office notified the contractor in advance that the floodgates would be closed.
The people who did not heed the notifications need to take responsibility, he said.
“We need to establish a culture where you must run as soon as you see the messages,” he said.
While reports showed that the city sent messages throughout the day reminding people to make sure their vehicles were safe and borough wardens broadcast similar messages over loudspeakers, independent Taipei City Councilor Chiu Wei-chieh (邱威傑) said the earlier messages only mentioned the floodgates along the Tamsui River (淡水河), not the Keelung River (基隆河), where the vehicles were stuck.
When they mentioned the Keelung River at 3:55pm, it was already too late, Chiu said.
Ko was defiant when criticized for not being in Taipei during the storm, saying that there are standard disaster response procedures and that officials are able to execute their duties without his supervision.
However, this was hardly a “standard” situation, as the Keelung River rose quickly and there was no time to do things by the book — which includes notifying the public of floodgate closures six hours in advance and towing vehicles two hours before they shut.
An investigation should be launched into the incident to prevent similar mishaps.
Despite blaming the public, Ko knows what needs to be done, several times describing how the messaging and disaster response system could be improved. Similarly, he scoffed at government heads visiting disaster areas — calling such trips “publicity stunts” — but he canceled campaign events in the south of Taiwan to visit a blocked tunnel in Taipei’s Neihu District (內湖).
As he knows, publicity is crucial to a politician. It is one thing to explain the city’s actions, but trying to dodge responsibility will only make people angrier.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS