Heavy rain brought by Typhoon Nesat over the weekend left a trail of destroyed property in northern Taiwan. Losses from natural disasters are expected, but the circumstances that led to vehicles being swamped after floodgates near Bailing Bridge (百齡橋) in Taipei’s Shilin District (士林) were closed have prompted criticism.
Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) called for improvements to integrated warning and public messaging systems, but added: “Each citizen should take responsibility for their own behavior” when asked why vehicles had not been moved after warning messages were sent.
City councilors and legislators said that owners of the vehicles had not been notified early enough, while about a dozen workers at a canceled music festival were on the riverside when the floodgates were closed.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Michelle Lin (林楚茵) said that the Taipei City Government only messaged the vehicle owners via Line on Sunday after the floodgates were shut at 4pm. Others said that there was a message at 3:55pm, which would still have been too late.
New Power Party Taipei City Councilor Meredith Huang (黃郁芬) on Monday wrote online that the festival contractors only received a message after the gates were shut.
However, Ko said that the city’s Parking Management and Development Office had sent four text messages to vehicle owners, with the first on Sunday morning, and that the Hydraulic Engineering Office notified the contractor in advance that the floodgates would be closed.
The people who did not heed the notifications need to take responsibility, he said.
“We need to establish a culture where you must run as soon as you see the messages,” he said.
While reports showed that the city sent messages throughout the day reminding people to make sure their vehicles were safe and borough wardens broadcast similar messages over loudspeakers, independent Taipei City Councilor Chiu Wei-chieh (邱威傑) said the earlier messages only mentioned the floodgates along the Tamsui River (淡水河), not the Keelung River (基隆河), where the vehicles were stuck.
When they mentioned the Keelung River at 3:55pm, it was already too late, Chiu said.
Ko was defiant when criticized for not being in Taipei during the storm, saying that there are standard disaster response procedures and that officials are able to execute their duties without his supervision.
However, this was hardly a “standard” situation, as the Keelung River rose quickly and there was no time to do things by the book — which includes notifying the public of floodgate closures six hours in advance and towing vehicles two hours before they shut.
An investigation should be launched into the incident to prevent similar mishaps.
Despite blaming the public, Ko knows what needs to be done, several times describing how the messaging and disaster response system could be improved. Similarly, he scoffed at government heads visiting disaster areas — calling such trips “publicity stunts” — but he canceled campaign events in the south of Taiwan to visit a blocked tunnel in Taipei’s Neihu District (內湖).
As he knows, publicity is crucial to a politician. It is one thing to explain the city’s actions, but trying to dodge responsibility will only make people angrier.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS