Heavy rain brought by Typhoon Nesat over the weekend left a trail of destroyed property in northern Taiwan. Losses from natural disasters are expected, but the circumstances that led to vehicles being swamped after floodgates near Bailing Bridge (百齡橋) in Taipei’s Shilin District (士林) were closed have prompted criticism.
Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) called for improvements to integrated warning and public messaging systems, but added: “Each citizen should take responsibility for their own behavior” when asked why vehicles had not been moved after warning messages were sent.
City councilors and legislators said that owners of the vehicles had not been notified early enough, while about a dozen workers at a canceled music festival were on the riverside when the floodgates were closed.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Michelle Lin (林楚茵) said that the Taipei City Government only messaged the vehicle owners via Line on Sunday after the floodgates were shut at 4pm. Others said that there was a message at 3:55pm, which would still have been too late.
New Power Party Taipei City Councilor Meredith Huang (黃郁芬) on Monday wrote online that the festival contractors only received a message after the gates were shut.
However, Ko said that the city’s Parking Management and Development Office had sent four text messages to vehicle owners, with the first on Sunday morning, and that the Hydraulic Engineering Office notified the contractor in advance that the floodgates would be closed.
The people who did not heed the notifications need to take responsibility, he said.
“We need to establish a culture where you must run as soon as you see the messages,” he said.
While reports showed that the city sent messages throughout the day reminding people to make sure their vehicles were safe and borough wardens broadcast similar messages over loudspeakers, independent Taipei City Councilor Chiu Wei-chieh (邱威傑) said the earlier messages only mentioned the floodgates along the Tamsui River (淡水河), not the Keelung River (基隆河), where the vehicles were stuck.
When they mentioned the Keelung River at 3:55pm, it was already too late, Chiu said.
Ko was defiant when criticized for not being in Taipei during the storm, saying that there are standard disaster response procedures and that officials are able to execute their duties without his supervision.
However, this was hardly a “standard” situation, as the Keelung River rose quickly and there was no time to do things by the book — which includes notifying the public of floodgate closures six hours in advance and towing vehicles two hours before they shut.
An investigation should be launched into the incident to prevent similar mishaps.
Despite blaming the public, Ko knows what needs to be done, several times describing how the messaging and disaster response system could be improved. Similarly, he scoffed at government heads visiting disaster areas — calling such trips “publicity stunts” — but he canceled campaign events in the south of Taiwan to visit a blocked tunnel in Taipei’s Neihu District (內湖).
As he knows, publicity is crucial to a politician. It is one thing to explain the city’s actions, but trying to dodge responsibility will only make people angrier.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Former Fijian prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry spoke at the Yushan Forum in Taipei on Monday, saying that while global conflicts were causing economic strife in the world, Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy (NSP) serves as a stabilizing force in the Indo-Pacific region and offers strategic opportunities for small island nations such as Fiji, as well as support in the fields of public health, education, renewable energy and agricultural technology. Taiwan does not have official diplomatic relations with Fiji, but it is one of the small island nations covered by the NSP. Chaudhry said that Fiji, as a sovereign nation, should support
RSS