I have come across my fair share of elitists during my years in college, ranging from those who refuse to date anyone who did not attend an Ivy League university to those who turn every conversation into an opportunity to brag about their “very impressive” SAT score.
Nonetheless, I have come to understand that no matter how obnoxious or condescending they might sound, all humans by nature yearn for respect and affirmation from others. From this perspective, it is just an overt way to maintain one’s self-esteem.
Recently, the topic of elitism has forcefully resurfaced in Taiwan’s public consciousness.
Due to a comment interpreted as having belittled former Hsinchu mayor Lin Chih-chien (林智堅) for attending Chung Hua University’s night school, Taiwan People’s Party Hsinchu mayoral candidate Ann Kao (高虹安) has been accused by many of being elitist.
These accusations have gained a lot of traction in the news media, as well as online. No matter what Kao’s intentions were when she made the comment, she is now vehemently distancing herself from being perceived as elitist.
The hysterical outpouring of condemnation surrounding Kao’s remark not only reflects a universal distaste for snobbish behavior, it reveals genuine grievances about educational credentialism.
Sociologist Johan Galtung describes educational credentialism, or “degreeocracy,” as “an ascriptive system in the sense that once one is allocated to a group it is very difficult to change one’s social class. It is like being born into a class, only that in a degreeocracy social birth takes place later than biological birth.”
Taiwan’s education system is assumed to operate under a meritocratic principle that educational opportunities are available to everyone regardless of class background — advancing within the system depends solely on one’s hard work and intellect. Upon closer inspection, this is a gross simplification.
Socioeconomic background is a statistically significant factor in influencing educational outcomes. Middle and upper class families are more likely to have the means to afford additional educational resources such as private tutors or cram schools for their children, while lower class families are more likely to need their children to work part-time jobs.
Nonetheless, these complexities are often ignored to feed the illusion of equality, which strengthens the system of degreeocracy. Furthermore, many members of the upper and middle classes, coming from privileged educational backgrounds, often place inflated emphasis on educational credentials as an implicit means to preserve social standing and reinforce artificial social barriers between those deemed educated and those deemed not.
Degreeocracy has created a hypercompetitive educational environment that often forces students to focus solely on preparing for examinations instead of exploring potential passions.
Although the government has started to implement more holistic approaches to university admissions, most students still have to apply based on their examination results.
The most destructive aspect of degreeocracy is the toxic reductionist attitude of judging an individual’s character based solely on the school they attended.
It is painfully apparent that some people are unable to prove their self-worth to Taiwan if they did not attend a prestigious institution during their 20s.
Even graduating from a national university’s night school is often looked down upon by traditional college graduates. This has to change.
Not everyone is provided with sufficient resources or opportunities to focus on academics in the early decades of their lives. We should actively encourage those who seek to better themselves later in life. The attainment of knowledge should not be exclusionary.
As for those self-righteous people who resort to belittling Kao’s educational credentials with their “superior” credentials, they are part of the same problem.
To those who feel the need to preserve their fragile egos by putting down others, get off your high horse and grow up.
Linus Chiou studies physics and history at the University of Virginia.
When former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) first took office in 2016, she set ambitious goals for remaking the energy mix in Taiwan. At the core of this effort was a significant expansion of the percentage of renewable energy generated to keep pace with growing domestic and global demands to reduce emissions. This effort met with broad bipartisan support as all three major parties placed expanding renewable energy at the center of their energy platforms. However, over the past several years partisanship has become a major headwind in realizing a set of energy goals that all three parties profess to want. Tsai
An elderly mother and her daughter were found dead in Kaohsiung after having not been seen for several days, discovered only when a foul odor began to spread and drew neighbors’ attention. There have been many similar cases, but it is particularly troubling that some of the victims were excluded from the social welfare safety net because they did not meet eligibility criteria. According to media reports, the middle-aged daughter had sought help from the local borough warden. Although the warden did step in, many services were unavailable without out-of-pocket payments due to issues with eligibility, leaving the warden’s hands
Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesman Randhir Jaiswal told a news conference on Jan. 9, in response to China’s latest round of live-fire exercises in the Taiwan Strait: “India has an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our trade, economic, people-to-people and maritime interests. We urge all parties to exercise restraint, avoid unilateral actions and resolve issues peacefully without threat or use of force.” The statement set a firm tone at the beginning of the year for India-Taiwan relations, and reflects New Delhi’s recognition of shared interests and the strategic importance of regional stability. While India
A survey released on Wednesday by the Taiwan Inspiration Association (TIA) offered a stark look into public feeling on national security. Its results indicate concern over the nation’s defensive capability as well as skepticism about the government’s ability to safeguard it. Slightly more than 70 percent of respondents said they do not believe Taiwan has sufficient capacity to defend itself in the event of war, saying there is a lack of advanced military hardware. At the same time, 62.5 percent opposed the opposition’s efforts to block the government’s NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.6 billion) special defense budget. More than half of respondents — 56.4
RSS