The 77th session of the UN General Assembly opened on Sept. 13. More than 10 overseas Taiwanese organizations had submitted a petition to the UN secretary-general, protesting that 23.5 million Taiwanese are excluded from representation.
As president of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance, I also submitted a letter to the UN, saying that Taiwanese should have the right to be represented under the name of Taiwan.
The government has been asking its allies to support Taiwan’s entry into the UN, but under its official name, the Republic of China (ROC). Doing so would have involved the right to represent China, with the ROC replacing the People’s Republic of China (PRC) at the UN.
This would be opposed by China and even if Taiwan were successful, it would have meant that Taiwan was representing China, and that Taiwan was China, which is clearly not the case.
After World War II, the US and the Soviet Union formed the UN together with the other founding members of the Security Council. The Security Council included the US, the Soviet Union, a Britain much weakened from the war, a France newly emerged from the ignominy of German occupation and the ROC of the Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) government, saved from the brink of extinction during the Second Sino-Japanese War only by the support of the US.
Chiang’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was defeated by the Chinese communists after the war. His military clique privately deployed resources to occupied Taiwan and Chiang followed in exile, saying that the KMT represented the ROC, thus retaining China’s seat in the UN.
On Oct. 25, 1971, the UN General Assembly passed Resolution 2758, recognizing the PRC as the only legitimate representative of China at the UN and removing “the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek.” This was Chiang and his representatives being removed; Taiwan itself has never entered the UN.
Beijing has continuously peddled the lie that Taiwan is a part of China and the KMT regime has sung the same song in its exile on this side of the Taiwan Strait.
During the Cold War, the US followed the strategy of allying with China to control the Soviet Union, and this has meant that the US has preferred to maintain an ambiguous attitude toward the question of Taiwan.
Today, the international situation has changed and the US’ strategy has become one of containing China, while Taiwan has become a democracy, a nation ruled by the people, for the people. For this reason, the US’ attitude toward it has changed, too.
UN Resolution 2758 is almost half a century old. US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Rick Waters has publicly criticized China for “misusing” the resolution to prevent Taiwan’s meaningful participation in the UN for a long time.
The US, then, acknowledges that Taiwan does not belong to China, and that Resolution 2758 relates only to China and has nothing to do with Taiwan.
The US Senate Foreign Affairs Committee has passed the draft Taiwan policy act, clearly saying that its purpose is to “support Taiwan’s security and right to self-determination.” The US supports Taiwanese’s right to determine for themselves their status and future, and that China should not have a say in this.
Taiwanese should also demonstrate their own resolve for this, and work to join not just the UN, but also other international organizations, and discard the name of the ROC, which misrepresents what we are to ourselves and to others.
Tommy Lin is president of the Formosa Republican Association.
Translated by Paul Cooper
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs spokesman for maritime affairs Rogelio Villanueva on Monday said that Manila’s claims in the South China Sea are backed by international law. Villanueva was responding to a social media post by the Chinese embassy alleging that a former Philippine ambassador in 1990 had written a letter to a German radio operator stating that the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島) did not fall within Manila’s territory. “Sovereignty is not merely claimed, it is exercised,” Villanueva said. The Philippines won a landmark case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016 that found China’s sweeping claim of sovereignty in
RSS