I never thought visiting my home after three years away could be so confusing and eye-opening.
After living in the third-best country in the world for expatriates, returning to the chaotic urban life of India was a challenge. I felt the depth of what I usually cite as a hurdle in India-Taiwan relations — cultural and behavioral differences.
Aside from grappling with my not so new surroundings, I also had to deal with a very genuine query — “Where is Taiwan?” — a question people stopped asking last month.
The question did not bother me as I might have expected, but answering it was not easy.
My mother has been asked the same question on various occasions. To my disappointment, she chooses the most unfortunate answer: China.
Her response is because it is easier for people to understand. Although a harmless explanation, it is most telling.
The same people probably also do not know where Thailand is, yet they would never bother to ask the question because popular culture has already come into play.
Taking a page out of my mother’s book, I found solace in another unfortunate answer: “It’s near Japan.”
With all my knowledge in hand, I still feel unequipped to respond.
Having lived in Taiwan, I consider it a responsibility to tell people about this gem of a place.
Indians often ask very elementary questions yet make contrary statements about Taiwan. I understand that not everyone can know Taiwan as profoundly as those who have visited or lived here, but many of my hometown folks feel very sure about its future with respect to China.
The advice I received during China’s military incursions around the nation were interesting. Everyone from grandfathers and uncles to my doctor and his assistant had an opinion.
Thanks to over-dramatized news reporting, the island was apparently attacked to the point of no return.
“You should not go back,” and “if you are going, come back as soon as possible,” some said.
“Live somewhere else. It is not safe,” said others, claiming that “China will attack.”
The straw that broke the camel’s back was: “Russia has already attacked Ukraine, and now China will attack Taiwan.”
The parallels with Hong Kong were also drawn by the avid consumers of television. The concern about my safety was so apparent that it even followed me to the airport. While checking my passport, an immigration officer calmly recommended that I reconsider traveling in such a turn of events.
Although disheartening, such conversations reflect a perspective. The majority of Indians are certain of China’s warmongering character.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has often been championed for keeping a bigger and stronger opponent on its toes.
However, winning a fight is a numbers game and many people are not so sure that the US would step in to support at the hour of need. The complexity of the Chinese threat to Taiwan is not within public knowledge.
Taiwan has found a new place in Indian news media for being at odds with China, taking the opportunity to highlight the goading it experiences on a daily basis.
However, people are not so sure of India’s role in the crisis. It is not seen as a consequential actor.
The state of world affairs is discouraging and overwhelming. Everyone wants to fight their own battles. As the celebrated anthropologist Jane Goodall said, any exercise to make a difference starts from home. It is time to genuinely talk about Taiwan.
Naina Singh is a researcher at the Graduate Institute of International Politics at National Chung Hsing University, Taichung.
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
RSS