On Wednesday last week, China’s official Xinhua news agency published a short report saying that Zhang Zhijun (張志軍), president of China’s semi-official Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits, had met a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation headed by KMT Vice Chairman Andrew Hsia (夏立言) in the city of Kunshan in China’s Jiangsu Province.
However, the 239-character report only mentioned what Zhang said at the meeting, with nothing about what Hsia said, and had no accompanying photographs.
This shows how little the KMT’s trip mattered in the eyes of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Just as China was holding belligerent military exercises around Taiwan, which undermined regional peace and were widely condemned by the international community, the KMT insisted on ignoring the opposition of wiser voices in Taiwan.
Despite everything, it sent the delegation, which signaled a friendly message to the CCP.
However, not a word of gratitude was heard from the CCP, which instead “reminded” the KMT to adhere to the so-called “1992 consensus” and oppose “Taiwan independence.”
The KMT’s act of self-humiliation is reminiscent of what happened in 1948, when it was being buffeted by the storm of the Chinese Civil War.
In January of that year, a group of KMT members established the Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang (中國國民黨革命委員會), which supported the CCP’s call, as one of its “May Day slogans,” to establish a democratic coalition government.
In so doing, the committee sent a friendly message to the CCP.
Today, the committee is a subordinate organization of the CCP, with its headquarters on humble Donghuangchenggen S Street in Beijing’s Dongcheng District (東城).
The committee’s expenses are entirely funded by a budget allocated by the CCP-led Chinese government, and its main task year after year is to implement the CCP’s policy decisions and study the spirit of CCP leaders’ speeches.
For example, according to the records of a meeting of the Revolutionary Committee’s Central Committee, its main task this year is to “hold high the great banner of socialism with Chinese characteristics, taking Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) thought about socialism with Chinese characteristics in the new era as its guide, and to thoroughly carry out the spirit of the CCP’s 19th National Congress and the second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth plenary sessions of the CCP’s 19th Central Committee, so as to welcome the victorious opening the CCP’s 20th National Congress with excellent achievements.”
It is sad to see what has become of this old KMT faction.
The KMT of today is rushing into the arms of the CCP, just as its Revolutionary Committee did in 1948. How the mighty have fallen. It is a shame indeed.
Yu Kung is a Taiwanese entrepreneur working in China.
Translated by Julian Clegg
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS