On Wednesday last week, China’s official Xinhua news agency published a short report saying that Zhang Zhijun (張志軍), president of China’s semi-official Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits, had met a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation headed by KMT Vice Chairman Andrew Hsia (夏立言) in the city of Kunshan in China’s Jiangsu Province.
However, the 239-character report only mentioned what Zhang said at the meeting, with nothing about what Hsia said, and had no accompanying photographs.
This shows how little the KMT’s trip mattered in the eyes of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Just as China was holding belligerent military exercises around Taiwan, which undermined regional peace and were widely condemned by the international community, the KMT insisted on ignoring the opposition of wiser voices in Taiwan.
Despite everything, it sent the delegation, which signaled a friendly message to the CCP.
However, not a word of gratitude was heard from the CCP, which instead “reminded” the KMT to adhere to the so-called “1992 consensus” and oppose “Taiwan independence.”
The KMT’s act of self-humiliation is reminiscent of what happened in 1948, when it was being buffeted by the storm of the Chinese Civil War.
In January of that year, a group of KMT members established the Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang (中國國民黨革命委員會), which supported the CCP’s call, as one of its “May Day slogans,” to establish a democratic coalition government.
In so doing, the committee sent a friendly message to the CCP.
Today, the committee is a subordinate organization of the CCP, with its headquarters on humble Donghuangchenggen S Street in Beijing’s Dongcheng District (東城).
The committee’s expenses are entirely funded by a budget allocated by the CCP-led Chinese government, and its main task year after year is to implement the CCP’s policy decisions and study the spirit of CCP leaders’ speeches.
For example, according to the records of a meeting of the Revolutionary Committee’s Central Committee, its main task this year is to “hold high the great banner of socialism with Chinese characteristics, taking Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) thought about socialism with Chinese characteristics in the new era as its guide, and to thoroughly carry out the spirit of the CCP’s 19th National Congress and the second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth plenary sessions of the CCP’s 19th Central Committee, so as to welcome the victorious opening the CCP’s 20th National Congress with excellent achievements.”
It is sad to see what has become of this old KMT faction.
The KMT of today is rushing into the arms of the CCP, just as its Revolutionary Committee did in 1948. How the mighty have fallen. It is a shame indeed.
Yu Kung is a Taiwanese entrepreneur working in China.
Translated by Julian Clegg
As Ukraine leads the global fight for democracy, Taiwan, facing a potential war with China, should draw lessons from Ukraine’s cyberwarfare success. Taiwan has been enhancing its arsenal with advanced weapons from the West in anticipation of a possible full-scale invasion. However, Taipei should also consider Ukraine’s effective digital warfare, notably the “IT [information technology] Army,” a decentralized force instrumental in Kyiv’s cybercampaigns. In February 2022, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine marked the onset of a significant cyberwar, where fears of a “digital Pearl Harbor” in Ukraine were unmet, thanks to robust cyberdefenses backed by Western public and private support. This led
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is attempting to create an alternative international world order to the US-dominated model. China has benefited hugely from the current order since former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) opened up its economy five decades ago. Countries can be categorized as continental or maritime, and to a great degree this determines their optimum foreign policy. China is continental, as is Russia. The US initially followed a continental foreign policy, before it settled on a maritime model. The British empire was so successful because a tiny island kingdom built a formidable naval presence. The US-dominated world order, stabilized by
“You are Taiwanese? Do you speak Taiwanese then?” Growing up in Buenos Aires, my school memories were filled with Spanish, a language that dances off the tongue with the same rhythm and elegance as the tango. However, in my house, a different melody would play — one that alluded to my roots, an artisanal, homemade combination of Taiwanese Hokkien and Mandarin. Although it was a beautiful sound, it was not a tempo I could follow. Put simply, the Taiwanese language was too hard for me to grasp. Eventually, my parents gave into my requests and abandoned that unique fusion of Chinese and
On April 24, US President Joe Biden signed the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act. The law, which was overwhelmingly approved by the US Congress, requires the popular video-sharing app TikTok to divest from its parent company, China-based ByteDance, or face a ban in the US. The legislation highlights a dilemma faced by democratic countries, including Taiwan, that pits free speech against national security interests. The US ultimatum is meant to address national security concerns that, according to China’s National Security Law and National Intelligence Law, obligates Chinese individuals and organizations to support national intelligence work, allowing the