Even as China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) was conducting live-fire drills and a simulated blockade in the waters around Taiwan, and despite concerns that his plans would seriously damage the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) prospects in the November local elections, KMT Vice Chairman Andrew Hsia (夏立言) insisted on leading a party delegation to China.
Unable to prevent the trip, KMT politicians were only able to call for the itinerary of the visit to be public and transparent, and urge Hsia to express Taiwanese’s dissatisfaction with the PLA’s exercises.
According to the KMT’s account of what occurred during his meeting with China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits Chairman Zhang Zhijun (張志軍), Hsia did object to the exercises.
However, Zhang said that China’s activities were aimed at safeguarding national sovereignty and its territorial integrity, and that it was targeting separatist activities by the Taiwanese independence movement and foreign interference.
Taiwanese remain unconvinced about whether Hsia did make those objections on their behalf, as the KMT’s “account” would have them believe, and Hsia did not press the matter further after Zhang’s lecture.
The PLA subsequently announced that it would conduct another two days of live-fire drills, on Friday and yesterday, off China’s Fujian Province and only 140km from Hsinchu. They were enough to show that Hsia’s objections were a mere formality at best, designed only for the optics they would afford back home.
When it comes to expressing objections, it is a case of “go big or go home.” Former minister of health and welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) showed how things should be done when he led a delegation to the World Health Assembly (WHA) meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, in May 2017.
Despite Taiwan not having received a formal letter of invitation, Chen went anyway, to present a letter of protest to the Swiss, expressing Taiwan’s anger at China’s interference in Taiwan’s participation at the WHA. He also held a news conference an hour before the opening of the meeting, protesting the WHA’s failure to invite Taiwan.
If Hsia cannot find anything useful to learn from the way Democratic Progressive Party politicians do things, perhaps he could take a leaf from his own party’s book, and how it protested the government’s decision to lift the ban on US imports of pork containing ractopamine residue. That certainly grabbed people’s attention.
In November 2020, KMT legislators flung pig offal around the legislative chamber and blew whistles and air horns to drown out Premier Su Tseng-chang’s (蘇貞昌) question-and-answer session to boycott the government’s policy. The story even made it into the foreign media.
Throwing offal and sounding air horns might have been gilding the lily, but if Hsia had refused to attend the dinner with Zhang, having expressed Taiwan’s objections to the drills, or even staged a mass walkout after Zhang had delivered his little lecture to express his dissatisfaction with the response, there would have been no need for the KMT to offer its own account: Taiwanese and the international community would have been very clear about what the KMT’s position on the PLA’s live-fire exercises was.
Lin Han is a junior-high school teacher.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry. Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
RSS