Former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator Chen Min-jen (陳明真) recently published an article calling for the government to push back the date for realizing a nuclear-power-free Taiwan from 2025 to 2035.
When Germany implemented a similar policy in 1997, it sought to phase out nuclear power by 2022, Chen said, adding that if Germany envisioned 25 years to reach its goal, it would be reasonable for Taiwan to give itself 19 years to wean itself off nuclear energy.
Taking Taiwan’s situation into account, the nation should realize that postponing the goal is inevitable.
Small and densely populated, Taiwan is no place for nuclear energy. As a result, I supported the DPP’s campaign when the administration of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) vowed to achieve a “nuclear-free homeland” by 2025, and participated in many rallies against nuclear power.
However, the original schedule was based on peacetime conditions; it did not take into account shipping problems, risks of war, or climate or environmental issues. Environmental protests and several black swan events have in the past few years impeded the original schedule, and it is no longer possible to reach the goal in time.
Consequently, the government should adjust the policy and convey the reasons for not being able to meet the deadline to the public. Even though sarcasm and ridicule from opposition parties could be expected, most Taiwanese would understand the government’s plight.
Exploitation and destruction of wildlife and the environment has exceeded the Earth’s tolerance. Extreme climate events are taking place around the world. Severe droughts have led to reduced crop yield and shortage of water for humans and livestock. Deadly rainstorms have caused a great number of casualties and damage to property. Extremely hot weather has fueled huge wildfires around the globe. The melting of glaciers and polar ice caps have greatly affected marine and terrestrial ecosystems. These unforeseen extreme weather events have brought damage and losses to food and electricity supplies.
As Shakespeare wrote: “When sorrows come, they come not single spies, but in battalions.” After Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong (毛澤東), the world now has to deal with power-hungry strongmen such as Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), who harbor ambitions to conquer the world via overwhelming military force. Putin’s invasion of Ukraine has triggered an energy and food crisis, undermining nations’ efforts to achieve net zero carbon emissions.
As possibilities of war brought about unprecedented challenges, Xi’s military drills encircling Taiwan have put a spotlight on energy resource importation.
As sustainable energy has not become a mainstream energy solution in Taiwan, global issues have to be taken into account. Pushing back the date for the nuclear-free homeland policy has become a choice of necessity.
However, as nuclear waste disposal is another issue at hand, solving it would be a precondition for the policy’s adjustment.
Jhang Shih-hsien is a retired researcher.
Translated by Rita Wang
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
Last month, two major diplomatic events unfolded in Southeast Asia that suggested subtle shifts in the region’s strategic landscape. The 46th ASEAN Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-Gulf-Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Trilateral Summit in Kuala Lumpur coincided with French President Emmanuel Macron’s high-profile visits to Vietnam, Indonesia and Singapore. Together, they highlighted ASEAN’s maturing global posture, deepening regional integration and China’s intensifying efforts to recalibrate its economic diplomacy amid uncertainties posed by the US. The ASEAN summit took place amid rising protectionist policies from the US, notably sweeping tariffs on goods from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, with duties as high as 49 percent.