National Taiwan University (NTU) has revoked the master’s degree of former Hsinchu mayor Lin Chih-chien (林智堅) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), who withdrew his candidacy in the Taoyuan mayoral election over a plagiarism scandal that led to the revocation. NTU president Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔) and NTU College of Social Sciences dean Su Hung-dah (蘇宏達) announced the annulment of Lin’s degree at a news conference, saying that the scandal had damaged the university’s reputation.
However, have Kuan and Su contributed to the school’s reputation? Before he was elected NTU president, Kuan caused controversy by simultaneously serving as an “independent director” at a private company and teaching at the university. He has also been accused of plagiarism. Su has also caused controversy, as he had criticized Representative to Japan Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) after the suicide of a Taiwanese diplomat.
Did these controversies affect the school’s reputation? The final verdict of Lin’s case will be made by voters in Taoyuan on Nov. 26.
In terms of the school’s reputation, late NTU professor Peng Ming-min (彭明敏) should not be forgotten. Peng died this year at age 98, without seeing his goal of turning Taiwan into a normal country fulfilled. After Peng and two of his students in 1964 attempted to release a manifesto titled A Declaration of Formosan Self-Salvation, he became a political prisoner of conscience and was forced to live in exile for more than 20 years. NTU failed to protect him at the time, although the manifesto, which called on Taiwan to democratize, pointed in the right direction.
In Taiwan, politicians like to promote their status by obtaining academic degrees, and universities have started offering tailor-made “in-service” master’s programs for them, although the trend is slowly cooling after a series of plagiarism scandals in the past few years.
However, looking at political leaders around the world, few value education credentials more than those in Taiwan, where the share of holders of master’s degrees and doctorates is especially high.
What other country has a president, a premier and ministers all holding master’s or doctoral degrees? Policymakers and their top aides in most other countries have professional experience that enables them to make sophisticated decisions.
For example, John Major, British prime minister from 1990 to 1997, rose through the ranks even though he never attended university and started his career as an insurance agent.
As several “thesis gate” scandals exposed the wrongdoings of one Taiwanese politician after another, the public should remember that there is a difference between learning ability and academic background. In the 1960s, Sony cofounder Akio Morita in a book titled Never Mind School Records emphasized the importance of practical abilities over academic achievements. His criticism of credentialism served as a warning to the world. Unfortunately, Taiwanese society has been kidnapped by credentialism, and most people have forgotten about the difference between learning ability and academic background.
In the past few years, many vocational schools in Taiwan have upgraded their status to become vocational senior high schools, five-year junior colleges, colleges or universities of science and technology. Although such schools can award students academic degrees, what practical knowledge do their graduates have after studying at them?
Despite the large number of Taiwanese universities offering master’s and doctoral programs, many students find it difficult to contribute to society after entering the workforce because they are not able to apply what they spent all those years studying.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission