Europe’s era of “Germany knows best” is coming to an end.
Berlin for the past decade commanded moral and financial authority in the EU, guiding policy and playing bad cop to the weaker southern economies. The energy crisis has upended that balance.
Germany’s reliance on Russia has exposed the flaws of its economic model — high-intensity industry running on cheap gas — and the blindness of its political class to its dependence on the Kremlin.
Illustration: Yusha
While Berlin is still coming to grips with the shock, Europe’s south is growing assertive. It is not revenge for years of German-led austerity, but a recalibration of forces that could ultimately result in a healthier EU.
Spain is an example. Spanish Minister for Ecological Transition Teresa Ribera bared teeth when she hit back at a European Commission proposal demanding that all 27 member states cut energy consumption by 15 percent this winter. In pushing back, Ribera said that Madrid had done its homework. It had little exposure to Russia and invested heavily in renewables — most importantly, she said, Spain had “lived within its means.”
The jab echoed the language from German rebukes at the height of the European financial crisis, when Berlin wrote the biggest checks in exchange for structural reforms that deepened the south’s economic slump.
The language was an unusual show of bravado for a country such as Spain, which is usually a net beneficiary of European funding. Reactions to her statements were split between those who said it was about time to call out the inconsistencies from Berlin and those fearful that such language risked inflaming old tensions.
In my view, Ribera’s comment was a mix of both, reflecting exasperation with the German reluctance to accept the monumental failure of its Russia policy. While everyone else seems to have realized “Made in Germany” was built on a shaky foundation, Berlin had yet to eat real humble pie, which is usually the first step before asking for help.
Spain was among the first to sound the alarm on the energy crisis, just as Putin began to squeeze supply and the market started to show signs of stress at the end of last year. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, who also faces enormous pressure to bring down inflation and energy bills at home, suggested in autumn last year that rocketing energy prices would require a joint European response.
Madrid argued — as it has for a while — that it needs better energy interconnectivity with the rest of Europe. Reducing consumption at home cannot help countries such as Germany if Madrid cannot export its surplus. Spain’s pitch fell on deaf ears, brushed aside as another example of the south seeking a handout.
Energy only became a European problem when the risks for Germany began to look insurmountable.
That reflects Europe’s policymaking problem — and points the way to a solution. It is time that proposals from southern Europe are taken more seriously. A rebalancing, if it leads to improved decisionmaking, should be welcomed in Brussels, where each leader speaks simultaneously to their domestic audience and their counterparts.
To their credit, the leaders of the southern nations agreed to a deal designed for Germany at record speed this week, moving beyond rhetorical resistance and avoiding critics’ schadenfreude.
It would have been silly and shortsighted, and, above all, a victory to Russia if the EU had failed. The Kremlin was caught off guard by the unity in Europe, and pitting Europeans against each other would undo that.
Ribera summarized it well after the deal was approved: In Europe, “when a neighbor calls for help, you have to help.”
That is the same spirit that got Europe through the COVID-19 pandemic and saw Germany cross its red line to agree to joint debt, a watershed moment for the EU. Plus, given their co-dependency, European crises are essentially circular. A recession in Germany, the euro area’s largest economy, would be detrimental for all.
A clash between northern and southern Europe would drag the continent back after a decade of joint problem-solving. Perhaps, considering the size of the German fiasco and the challenges it poses for the whole of Europe, Berlin should not be surprised to see the south asking for a bigger say.
Maria Tadeo is the European correspondent for Bloomberg Television and based in Brussels, where she covers European politics, economics and NATO. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS