A depositors’ rights movement triggered by the collapse of several rural banks in China’s Henan Province has been simmering for a while and shows no signs of abating.
The local government first tried to prevent angry depositors from congregating by using the pretext of “pandemic prevention” and imposing restrictions on individual depositors through their mandatory COVID-19 smartphone apps. When that failed, the authorities started sending thugs wearing white shirts to beat up the depositors — including elderly people and pregnant women — causing bloody injuries in several cases, while the police stood by and did nothing. It resembled the 2019 Yuen Long attack on Hong Kong democracy advocates.
Besides using violence to threaten depositors, many of whom had lost their life savings, the authorities also tricked them into signing declarations that they would drop their claims in exchange for an “advance payment” of 50,000 yuan (US$7,389).
These incidents demonstrate China’s uncivilized ways to “solve problems” and expose the extent of government corruption. They also reveal emerging problems in China’s economy.
Rural bank failures might be just a prelude to the coming collapse of China, the bursting of its economic bubble.
China’s numbers-oriented economic policies, as well as its serious problems of corruption and ineffective regulation, made real estate the easiest option for fraudulent accounting, and collusion between government entities and businesses in pursuit of profit. Property developers used high-leverage and high-turnover loans to set up a large number of construction projects. Huge sums of hot money blindly poured into the property market, driving up housing prices and creating the illusion of a prosperous urban China posting impressive economic figures. While spurring the development of related industries, it also caused a real-estate glut.
Speaking at the Chinese Communist Party’s 19th National Congress in October 2017, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) said: “We must not forget that housing is for living in, not for speculation.”
The Chinese government then adopted a policy of suppressing property prices, but its measures went too far and caused many property developers to close or default. It dealt a heavy blow to the housing market and triggered a chain reaction of bad bank loans. Consequently, the government was forced to relax the restrictions, and even came up with a ridiculous policy of “interviewing” wealthy property owners who “maliciously refused to sell their properties.”
However, political issues such as China’s iron-fisted COVID-19 containment policies, its human rights issues and its pro-Russian stance, as well as rising operating costs, have prompted many investors to leave the country. This has pushed up the unemployment rate.
Under such circumstances, there is little interest in buying real estate, causing the country’s worrisome property vacancy rate to reach new highs and starting to cause ruptures in financial supply chains.
The problem of unfinished buildings has continued to spread, starting with property developer Evergrande Group. Mortgage takers who cannot stand the situation anymore have started to collectively refuse mortgage payments on unfinished homes.
This has a knock-on effect on the banking system. When China’s four largest state-owned banks announced that the risk posed by bad debts is “controllable and preventable,” it caused even greater panic.
Problems stemming from the real-estate sector are snowballing and could be the straw that breaks the camel’s back.
China’s growing economic problems, in combination with inflationary pressure and weak domestic demand, might well drag down the global economy.
With the crisis of confidence in China’s banking system potentially leading toward collapse, symptoms such as bank depositors’ protests, mortgage payment boycotts and bank runs are likely to crop up all over the country.
Any further waves of protest will probably be met with further brutal crackdowns, as well as Chinese-style countermeasures such as stripping people’s wealth and printing large amounts of money. These “solutions” would only make the problems worse.
Xi might then have to decide whether to divert attention from the political and economic storms by ordering an attack on Taiwan.
Hong Tsun-ming is a specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s international section.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS