A depositors’ rights movement triggered by the collapse of several rural banks in China’s Henan Province has been simmering for a while and shows no signs of abating.
The local government first tried to prevent angry depositors from congregating by using the pretext of “pandemic prevention” and imposing restrictions on individual depositors through their mandatory COVID-19 smartphone apps. When that failed, the authorities started sending thugs wearing white shirts to beat up the depositors — including elderly people and pregnant women — causing bloody injuries in several cases, while the police stood by and did nothing. It resembled the 2019 Yuen Long attack on Hong Kong democracy advocates.
Besides using violence to threaten depositors, many of whom had lost their life savings, the authorities also tricked them into signing declarations that they would drop their claims in exchange for an “advance payment” of 50,000 yuan (US$7,389).
These incidents demonstrate China’s uncivilized ways to “solve problems” and expose the extent of government corruption. They also reveal emerging problems in China’s economy.
Rural bank failures might be just a prelude to the coming collapse of China, the bursting of its economic bubble.
China’s numbers-oriented economic policies, as well as its serious problems of corruption and ineffective regulation, made real estate the easiest option for fraudulent accounting, and collusion between government entities and businesses in pursuit of profit. Property developers used high-leverage and high-turnover loans to set up a large number of construction projects. Huge sums of hot money blindly poured into the property market, driving up housing prices and creating the illusion of a prosperous urban China posting impressive economic figures. While spurring the development of related industries, it also caused a real-estate glut.
Speaking at the Chinese Communist Party’s 19th National Congress in October 2017, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) said: “We must not forget that housing is for living in, not for speculation.”
The Chinese government then adopted a policy of suppressing property prices, but its measures went too far and caused many property developers to close or default. It dealt a heavy blow to the housing market and triggered a chain reaction of bad bank loans. Consequently, the government was forced to relax the restrictions, and even came up with a ridiculous policy of “interviewing” wealthy property owners who “maliciously refused to sell their properties.”
However, political issues such as China’s iron-fisted COVID-19 containment policies, its human rights issues and its pro-Russian stance, as well as rising operating costs, have prompted many investors to leave the country. This has pushed up the unemployment rate.
Under such circumstances, there is little interest in buying real estate, causing the country’s worrisome property vacancy rate to reach new highs and starting to cause ruptures in financial supply chains.
The problem of unfinished buildings has continued to spread, starting with property developer Evergrande Group. Mortgage takers who cannot stand the situation anymore have started to collectively refuse mortgage payments on unfinished homes.
This has a knock-on effect on the banking system. When China’s four largest state-owned banks announced that the risk posed by bad debts is “controllable and preventable,” it caused even greater panic.
Problems stemming from the real-estate sector are snowballing and could be the straw that breaks the camel’s back.
China’s growing economic problems, in combination with inflationary pressure and weak domestic demand, might well drag down the global economy.
With the crisis of confidence in China’s banking system potentially leading toward collapse, symptoms such as bank depositors’ protests, mortgage payment boycotts and bank runs are likely to crop up all over the country.
Any further waves of protest will probably be met with further brutal crackdowns, as well as Chinese-style countermeasures such as stripping people’s wealth and printing large amounts of money. These “solutions” would only make the problems worse.
Xi might then have to decide whether to divert attention from the political and economic storms by ordering an attack on Taiwan.
Hong Tsun-ming is a specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s international section.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has created a dilemma that could soon cause him to be hoisted with his own petard, bringing his leadership of China to an end. His threatening rhetoric over the unification of Taiwan with China, in which he has said, “we are willing to draw blood if necessary,” has placed Xi in a corner. Xi is portrayed as a strong world leader, yet he has created a scenario for himself that most likely would have an unfavorable outcome. With the 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) scheduled to convene this month, Xi cannot
The 77th session of the UN General Assembly opened on Sept. 13. More than 10 overseas Taiwanese organizations had submitted a petition to the UN secretary-general, protesting that 23.5 million Taiwanese are excluded from representation. As president of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance, I also submitted a letter to the UN, saying that Taiwanese should have the right to be represented under the name of Taiwan. The government has been asking its allies to support Taiwan’s entry into the UN, but under its official name, the Republic of China (ROC). Doing so would have involved the right to represent China, with
I was privileged to meet with many of Taiwan’s leaders and leading thinkers during a study tour visit in August. One theme I heard several times during that trip was that bad relations between the United States and China benefit Taiwan. At first thought, I empathize with the argument. After all, there is a troubling record of America’s leaders negotiating with Beijing over the heads of Taiwan’s leaders. For example, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt returned Taiwan to China after World War II. President Richard Nixon surprised Taiwan leaders with his 1972 trip to China. President Jimmy Carter unilaterally chose to normalize
Washington’s “one China” policy has not changed and the US does not take a position on Taiwan’s sovereignty issue, a US Department of State spokesperson has said. He said that this has been the principle of US policy toward Taiwan since 1979, and the policy has remained in effect. He also said that US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has privately made this clear to Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅). The US’ “one China” policy and China’s “one China” principle recognize China as the “representative of China.” The two diverge on the issue of Taiwan: Beijing asserts sovereignty
RSS