With political parties lining up their candidates to contest November’s nine-in-one local elections, the first significant mudslinging of the election season has already occurred, once again involving academic plagiarism.
The first clod was flung on Tuesday last week. Taipei City Councilor Wang Hung-wei (王鴻薇) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) told a news conference that Lin Chih-chien (林智堅) — who on Friday retired as mayor of Hsinchu, as he is the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) nominee for Taoyuan mayor — plagiarized his 2008 master’s thesis.
The DPP returned fire. Lin denied the allegation and threatened legal action against Wang, while Lin’s academic advisers said that the claims were untrue.
Meanwhile, a post on a Facebook account named Wen Ta-jui (翁達瑞) accused former legislator Ko Chih-en (柯志恩), the KMT’s candidate for Kaohsiung mayor, of “self-plagiarism” by submitting duplicate manuscripts to two different academic conferences. Ko denied the allegations.
The pyrotechnics did not stop there. On Friday, Wang led a flash mob of KMT Hsinchu city councilors to the Chung Hua University campus, where they chanted slogans outside the main entrance demanding that the university investigate Lin’s thesis.
KMT caucus whip Alex Fai (費鴻泰), a “deep blue” firebrand, called the university “third-rate.”
It would be tempting to argue that the two main parties are equally bad. After all, during the 2020 Kaohsiung mayoral by-election, the DPP leveled more successful accusations of plagiarism against the KMT’s candidate, Kaohsiung City Councilor Jane Lee (李眉蓁).
However, irrespective of the veracity of Wang’s claim and while academic plagiarism is a real problem in Taiwan that should be taken seriously, the KMT’s off-the-wall campaigning tactics differentiate it from the DPP.
The KMT’s attempt to exert political pressure on the university is spectacularly ill-judged. The party’s dark history of political persecution on university campuses during the Martial Law era — the arrests of members of political societies, the networks of informants, people mysteriously “falling” from the roofs of buildings — is still fresh in the memory of many Taiwanese.
It was terrible optics for the KMT, indicative of its general malaise and its cacoethes for tone-deaf political stunts. With its political DNA rooted firmly in authoritarianism, it still struggles to get its collective head around democracy.
Although Taiwan’s incremental democratization has already entered its fourth decade, to this day the KMT still stubbornly refuses to participate in the transitional justice process and keeps incriminating party archives sealed tight.
Contrast Taiwan’s situation with that of the former East Germany. By 1992, just three years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, all of the Stasi files had been made public. While it is true that Taiwan did not experience a “big bang” moment comparable to those of East Germany and other former Soviet Union satellite states, the KMT has been dragging its feet on the issue for far too long. Having failed to display genuine contrition, how can it expect to broaden its support?
Another problem for it is that KMT Chairman Eric Chu’s (朱立倫) leadership style is low-key to the point of being invisible. He has developed no discernible policy platform and the majority of the electorate would struggle to name a single KMT policy.
As with all of its recent chairs, the party appears rudderless under Chu, focused on opposition for the sake of it and bereft of an electoral strategy. Short of a miracle or massive interference by Beijing before November, the KMT’s electoral prospects appear grim.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS