The US Supreme Court’s ruling on June 24 that abortion is not protected under the US constitution, reversing the Roe v Wade ruling from nearly 50 years ago, sent the issue back to individual US states to decide. The ruling is expected to trigger a series of legal battles at the state level and has already sparked a wave of protests.
A trend toward the legalization or decrimilization of artificially induced abortion has been taking hold across the globe, whatever the motivations of the government of each country for promoting the procedure may be. In Taiwan abortion is legal, but conditional, according to the Genetic Health Act (優生保健法).
Those who support the legalization of abortion originally stated that their main consideration was to meet the needs of women in special circumstances, such as victims of rape and those who are physically unsuited to giving birth. The argument at the time was that legalizing abortion would eliminate illegal procedures by providing women with greater security guarantees.
However, with the abortion law as it currently stands, practically any woman who wishes to terminate her pregnancy can legally have an abortion, without any special circumstances.
Furthermore, since Taiwan legalized conditional abortion, the number of illegal abortions has not fallen, and it has aggravated a cycle of casual abortions and sexual abuse. In the past, a woman would only have an abortion if she was left with no choice or was in a difficult situation, for example if having a child would put her in financial difficulty or if she had become pregnant outside of wedlock.
However, in today’s society, young students use abortion as if it were contraception and display an indifferent attitude toward it. Women are seeking abortions at ever younger ages. The procedures are no longer limited to September — following an active summer recess — and are becoming an almost daily occurrence.
Gynecologists are even lamenting that some women seem to treat abortion as a trivial matter, with some undergoing multiple abortions within a single year.
According to data published by the Ministry of Health and Welfare in 2019, every year 30,000 to 40,000 women take the oral abortion pill Mifepristone, or RU-486, while 60,000 to 70,000 women apply for surgical abortions through the National Health Insurance system, the vast majority of which are a result of fetal abnormalities or other medical reasons. The number of women who undergo surgical abortions due to unintended pregnancies is unknown, as this involves personal information.
In 2017, the number of births in Taiwan fell below 200,000 for the first time and has continued to fall sharply since then. By contrast, between 90,000 and 110,000 fetuses are aborted in Taiwan every year and are denied a place in this world. It should ring alarm bells for any nation that wants to survive, as nearly one-third of total pregnancies are terminated every year in Taiwan.
Following the US Supreme Court’s historic ruling on Roe v Wade, which terminates constitutional protection for abortion, hopefully more people will face up to the procedure’s problems. With the general mood of society becoming increasingly open-minded and emphasizing a form of eugenics, hopefully people will reflect upon whether aborting fetuses is a good way to solve society’s problems.
The system fails to realize the good intentions of early advocates of abortion, and creates more problems than it solves at an individual and societal level. In particular, people must reflect on the serious negative impact that abortion provisions have had on the healthy development of society and culture.
Dino Wei is an information engineer.
Translated by Edward Jones
With the Year of the Snake reaching its conclusion on Monday next week, now is an opportune moment to reflect on the past year — a year marked by institutional strain and national resilience. For Taiwan, the Year of the Snake was a composite of political friction, economic momentum, social unease and strategic consolidation. In the political sphere, it was defined less by legislative productivity and more by partisan confrontation. The mass recall movement sought to remove 31 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators following the passage of controversial bills that expanded legislative powers and imposed sweeping budget cuts. While the effort
There is a story in India about a boy called Prahlad who was an ardent worshipper of Lord Narayana, whom his father considered an enemy. His son’s devotion vexed the father to the extent that he asked his sister, Holika, who could not be burned by fire, to sit with the boy in her lap and burn him to death. Prahlad knew about this evil plan, but sat in his aunt’s lap anyway. His faith won, as he remained unscathed by the fire, while his aunt was devoured by the flames. In some small way, Prahlad reminds me of Taiwan
When Hong Kong’s High Court sentenced newspaper owner Jimmy Lai (黎智英) to 20 years in prison this week, officials declared that his “heinous crimes” had long poisoned society and that his punishment represented justice restored. In their telling, Lai is the mastermind of Hong Kong’s unrest — the architect of a vast conspiracy that manipulated an otherwise contented population into defiance. They imply that removing him would lead to the return of stability. It is a politically convenient narrative — and a profoundly false one. Lai did not radicalize Hong Kong. He belonged to the same generation that fled from the Chinese
Former Hong Kong media magnate Jimmy Lai (黎智英), who on Monday was sentenced to 20 years in jail for his role in the 2019 Hong Kong democracy movement and “colluding with foreign forces,” once called on members of the US government for support in his struggle against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Speaking to a forum at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies in July 2019, Lai, speaking about the US having the moral authority over the CCP, said: “It’s like they are going to battle without any weapon, and you have the nuclear weapon. You can finish them in
RSS