The US Supreme Court’s ruling on June 24 that abortion is not protected under the US constitution, reversing the Roe v Wade ruling from nearly 50 years ago, sent the issue back to individual US states to decide. The ruling is expected to trigger a series of legal battles at the state level and has already sparked a wave of protests.
A trend toward the legalization or decrimilization of artificially induced abortion has been taking hold across the globe, whatever the motivations of the government of each country for promoting the procedure may be. In Taiwan abortion is legal, but conditional, according to the Genetic Health Act (優生保健法).
Those who support the legalization of abortion originally stated that their main consideration was to meet the needs of women in special circumstances, such as victims of rape and those who are physically unsuited to giving birth. The argument at the time was that legalizing abortion would eliminate illegal procedures by providing women with greater security guarantees.
However, with the abortion law as it currently stands, practically any woman who wishes to terminate her pregnancy can legally have an abortion, without any special circumstances.
Furthermore, since Taiwan legalized conditional abortion, the number of illegal abortions has not fallen, and it has aggravated a cycle of casual abortions and sexual abuse. In the past, a woman would only have an abortion if she was left with no choice or was in a difficult situation, for example if having a child would put her in financial difficulty or if she had become pregnant outside of wedlock.
However, in today’s society, young students use abortion as if it were contraception and display an indifferent attitude toward it. Women are seeking abortions at ever younger ages. The procedures are no longer limited to September — following an active summer recess — and are becoming an almost daily occurrence.
Gynecologists are even lamenting that some women seem to treat abortion as a trivial matter, with some undergoing multiple abortions within a single year.
According to data published by the Ministry of Health and Welfare in 2019, every year 30,000 to 40,000 women take the oral abortion pill Mifepristone, or RU-486, while 60,000 to 70,000 women apply for surgical abortions through the National Health Insurance system, the vast majority of which are a result of fetal abnormalities or other medical reasons. The number of women who undergo surgical abortions due to unintended pregnancies is unknown, as this involves personal information.
In 2017, the number of births in Taiwan fell below 200,000 for the first time and has continued to fall sharply since then. By contrast, between 90,000 and 110,000 fetuses are aborted in Taiwan every year and are denied a place in this world. It should ring alarm bells for any nation that wants to survive, as nearly one-third of total pregnancies are terminated every year in Taiwan.
Following the US Supreme Court’s historic ruling on Roe v Wade, which terminates constitutional protection for abortion, hopefully more people will face up to the procedure’s problems. With the general mood of society becoming increasingly open-minded and emphasizing a form of eugenics, hopefully people will reflect upon whether aborting fetuses is a good way to solve society’s problems.
The system fails to realize the good intentions of early advocates of abortion, and creates more problems than it solves at an individual and societal level. In particular, people must reflect on the serious negative impact that abortion provisions have had on the healthy development of society and culture.
Dino Wei is an information engineer.
Translated by Edward Jones
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS