People are speculating about Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) next move, given that his final term as mayor ends at the end of the year. As chairman of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), Ko on Sunday last week joined party members at Yilan County’s Luodong Night Market (羅東夜市) to drum up support for the party’s candidates in the nine-in-one elections in November.
Asked whether he would run for president in 2024 or back a candidate in a coalition with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), Ko said in a livestream interview that any strategy takes time to plan and carry out, then added that Taiwanese should elect him president in 2024 because he can bridge the political divide between the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). This is the only way to transform Taiwan into a united country, instead of a nation plagued by deep political fissures, he said.
DPP Legislator Cheng Yun-peng (鄭運鵬) wrote on social media that voters would decide with their ballots whether Ko, who is quick to use unsavory and provocative language against his political enemies, is the “solution” or the “troublemaker.” Other Internet users said that the Taipei mayor had slapped himself in the face, after he had attacked the ambition of former Taipei mayors who thought about running for president.
Becoming Taipei mayor has often been regarded as a stepping stone to the presidency, as in the case of former presidents Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
If Ko wishes to follow in his predecessors’ footsteps, he should first assess his performance over the past eight years. Ko has been considered a political chameleon, shifting his position from the green camp to the white camp and now to a white-tinged-with-red affiliation. He began the eight years as a political neophyte with pro-DPP leanings. He then introduced a new party into Taiwan’s political arena, intending the TPP to transcend the DPP and the KMT. Ko also seems to have pro-China leanings, such as demonstrated by his proposal to construct a bridge linking Kinmen (金門) and China’s Xiamen (廈門), which raised concerns about national security and had people questioning his ideology.
Ko has always been rated at the bottom of approval ratings. In retrospect, city residents might have difficulty recalling any of Ko’s contributions and achievements from his tenure as mayor. For example, the Taipei Dome is not expected to open before Ko leaves office. He has been unable to complete a single line in Taipei’s metro system, while Chen completed three lines in his tenure and Ma completed four in his.
Speculation that the TPP could collaborate with the KMT in the upcoming elections could have some truth to it, as Ko has focused his indignation on DPP politicians, while giving KMT members and their policies a pass. Ko’s blurring of the differences between the TPP and the KMT is said to be a way to turn pan-blue supporters white.
This kind of political maneuver might be shortsighted and utilitarian, but it shows that Ko is a cunning politician who can turn matters to his own advantage without winning over the public with leadership success or beneficial policies.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath