Taiwan’s university admissions results have just been released. There are still 117 vacancies for courses in medicine, and the shortfall in students throughout Taiwan has exceeded 10,000, an increase of more than 4,000 compared with last year.
The Joint Board of College Recruitment Commission explained this phenomenon by saying that the overall number of applications this year was down by about 4,000 from last year, and the 1,023 international students starting a course in Taiwan was lower than usual due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
I believe that the most important factors were the difficulty of the math section of the General Scholastic Ability Test (GSAT) university entrance examination, leading to a huge drop in the number of students passing the screening to enter top-tier universities, as well as the lack of flexibility in the design of the admissions threshold.
It is generally accepted that this year’s GSAT math section was tough, perhaps the most difficult there has ever been. As a result, only about 700 students taking the test received full marks, and only about 1,500 received a top ranking, representing only 2 percent of the students taking the test, compared with 20 percent of students making the top grade last year.
This means only 10 percent of the students made the top grade this year compared with last year. Therefore, it comes as no surprise that there were not enough students to fill the vacancies in Taiwan’s top-tier universities.
The vacancy rate at the top universities this year ranged from 10 percent to 22 percent. National Taiwan University (NTU) alone had 176 places unfilled.
There is clearly an issue with the system, and this hurts the applicants’ rights.
As the university admissions system has been designed with fixed thresholds — with high thresholds for Chinese, English, math and natural sciences at NTU and National Chengchi University (NCCU) — fewer students make the top grade and therefore apply for two departments.
However, many students prefer NTU over NCCU. This is where the shortfall happens.
Last year, when the math section was too easy, too many students achieved top grades, and a ridiculous situation occurred in which high scorers could not get into the university of their choice.
The solution lies in maintaining a consistent level of difficulty in the exams.
However, it would be better if the rigid five-threshold system for the two highest tiers were abandoned and instead be used as a reference point for applications. A floating design of the top percentage of candidates who apply for a given university could be adopted. This would reduce the effects of differences in exam question difficulty and avoid issues relating to quotas.
Chung Pang-yu is an adjunct assistant professor at National Kaohsiung Normal University’s department of education.
Translated by Paul Cooper
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS