Vietnam or other ASEAN states, and India could become the next manufacturing hubs of Taiwanese firms over the next one to two decades, especially after Apple Inc reportedly told its major contract manufacturers to boost capacity outside China to avert risks of production disruptions.
Apple is a key client of many Taiwanese manufacturers, which assemble iPhones, iPads, MacBook laptops and airPods in China or supply components for those gadgets. Some of Apple’s suppliers and manufacturing partners had to suspend production this month to comply with China’s “zero COVID” policy and strict restrictions to curb the spread of the virus in Shanghai.
Those measures led to a dip in revenue and shipments, as well as a spike in logistics costs, and the impact could last a bit longer before moderating as the port city reopens and production gradually resumes.
As more arbitrary and capricious actions from the Chinese government might be expected, Taiwanese manufacturers are seriously considering a major realignment of their manufacturing capacity to minimize operating risks.
That is a reverse of the manufacturing diversification inertia seen in the past. Large-scale manufacturers have taken advantage of China’s low-cost labor and comprehensive supply chains, as those two factors are crucial to making a profit from the low-margin business of hardware assembly. As building new supply chains elsewhere is a challenging and time-consuming task, they preferred to stay in their comfort zone rather than face new risks.
When President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) took office in 2016, she launched the New Southbound Policy — ticking off a list of countries that Taiwanese companies were encouraged to invest in to reduce their reliance on China. Local enterprises were not quick to embrace the policy. Presently, about 90 percent of Apple products are still made in China, based on the calculations of TF International Securities analyst Kuo Ming-chi (郭明錤).
However, with China’s investment environment undergoing significant changes because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the prolonged US-China trade dispute and Beijing’s crackdown on Chinese technology and financial giants, large-scale Taiwanese companies have been exploring other manufacturing hubs. This would be the biggest shift by Taiwanese firms after spending 30 years building their Chinese capacity.
iPhone assemblers Hon Hai Precision Industry Co and Pegatron Corp make iPhones in India, but only to supply the local market. Hon Hai said it is quickening expansion in India to match the pace of global peers. It is also investing in Southeast Asian countries, including Vietnam and Thailand.
Vietnam looks high on the priority list of Apple’s manufacturing partners to add new production, as Chinese companies that make AirPods have early on reportedly set up manufacturing in Vietnam.
Taiwanese companies have said it would be a big challenge to duplicate their Chinese production in other countries. Hon Hai said it would take at least three to five years to reach productivity similar to what it has in China now.
With the latest push from Apple, it has become an inevitable trend for Taiwan’s Apple suppliers and manufacturing partners to boost new capacity in countries other than China. With small-scale capacity already installed in India and Vietnam, it is no surprise that those two countries have a good chance of overtaking China and becoming the new manufacturing bases for Taiwanese firms.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS