The US on Friday hosted the second Global COVID-19 Summit, with at least 98 countries, including Taiwan, and regional alliances such as the G7, the G20, the African Union and the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) attending.
Washington is also leading a proposal to revise one of the most important documents in global health security — the International Health Regulations (IHR) — which are to be discussed during the 75th World Health Assembly (WHA) that starts on Sunday.
These two actions highlight the US’ strategic move to dominate the global health agenda and return to the core of governance, with the WHA serving as a stage for its leadership.
Since US President Joe Biden took office, Washington has actively participated in the setting of the global health agenda, taking the lead in debates and discussions of the COVID-19 pandemic and the revision of the IHR.
The key points of its proposed amendments to reform the IHR are: establish a Universal Health Periodic Review mechanism; authorize the WHO to inform the world directly of risks when a state party is unwilling to provide verified information; a state party should state the reason if it refuses technical assistance from the WHO, and the WHO should notify all members of the situation; a state party should state the reasons for refusing to allow the WHO to carry out onsite assessments, and the WHO should notify members of the situation; and establish a Compliance Committee to review state parties’ compliance with the agreement, and the WHO Secretariat should inform the WHA about all relevant actions each year.
The amendments proposed by the US — from the investigation of the origin of the pandemic to a member state’s obligation to notify the WHO and compliance reviews — are clearly targerted at China. By constructing a more efficient and transparent global health governance model, there would be no way for Beijing to shirk its responsibility, and in discussing this issue, the WHA would become the stage for the US to show its power.
Just a week before the WHA starts, the US hosted the second Global COVID-19 Summit, which revolves around “ending the acute phase of the pandemic and preparing for future health threats” to discuss health system issues in the COVID-19 era, such as pharmaceutical materials (oral antivirals and oxygen), the global logistics system and infrastructure.
Under the powerful action and leadership of the US, this summit has become the highest level of global COVID-19 discussion platform outside the UN General Assembly and the WHA, with the first summit held in September last year. Given that the discussions at the UN General Assembly and the WHA still focus on the governance system and overall reform, the US-led agenda is more practical and closer to the needs of countries, making it easier to build strong partnerships.
These series of actions by the US highlight two trends. First, the conflict between the US and China has been more concretely staged in various fields, and global governance during the COVID-19 era is no exception; and second, the US intends to deal with the “China factor in the UN.” Leading the COVID-19 summit and calling on major countries to join it are pre-emptive moves outside of the UN system that manifest the US’ ambition.
In addition, the US has not given up on increasing its presence and power in setting the WHO agenda, which can be seen in its active leadership in discussions related to the pandemic treaty and its leadership in revising the IHR. While regaining the mantel of leadership, the US is also committed to creating a model of global health governance that is dominated by democratic partners in order to contain Beijing’s “China Anti-epidemic Model” propaganda in the health field.
Taiwan, as a like-minded country, should take advantage of the situation to consider what meaningful contribution it can make as the US works to return to a dominant role in global health governance and highlight the importance of its participation in the US’ ambitious agenda.
Lin Shih-chia is executive director of the Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan and a former legislator. Wu Yi-chin is director of the foundation’s Global Health Research Center. Ting Wei-ming is an associate research fellow at the center.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
RSS