Beijing’s choice of representative to attend the inauguration of South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol on Tuesday provides a fascinating insight into the shifting sands of Northeast Asian geopolitics.
On Saturday last week, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Zhao Lijian (趙立堅) announced that Chinese Vice President Wang Qishan (王岐山) was to attend the inauguration ceremony on behalf of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
In 2013, then-Chinese vice premier Liu Yandong (劉延東), who was also a member of the Chinese Communist Party’s Central Political Bureau, attended former South Korean president Park Geun-hye’s inauguration.
For the inauguration of former South Korean president Lee Myung-bak in 2008, then-Chinese state councilor Tang Jiaxuan (唐家璇) attended. In 2003, then-Chinese vice premier Qian Qichen (錢其琛) attended the inauguration of former South Korean president Roh Moo-hyun.
Wang’s attendance marks the first time that Beijing has sent a representative as high-ranking as a vice president to a South Korean presidential inauguration.
From Xi’s choice to send Wang, who is highly conversant in North Korean affairs, it is possible to infer that the election of a pro-US, Japan-friendly South Korean president has touched a raw nerve in Pyongyang.
North Korea has in the past few months conducted a series of ballistic missile tests, significantly elevating tensions on the Korean Peninsula as the Russian invasion of Ukraine continues to rage in Europe.
The stability of the Korean Peninsula is of paramount importance to Beijing. Viewed from the perspective of regional strategy, the area, which shares a border with China, is analogous to the territorial relationship between Russia and Ukraine.
This is why Beijing felt it necessary to dispatch such a high-ranking official to the inauguration and obtain a personal assessment of the leadership group surrounding South Korea’s new president. Xi aims to better understand what Yoon’s intentions are regarding Seoul’s northern neighbor.
With Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida siding with the US over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Moscow announced that it would send military reinforcements to the disputed Kuril Islands, which Tokyo claims were illegally occupied by the Soviet Union at the end of World War II.
The situation in Northeast Asia, already tense, might be about to worsen significantly: China, North Korea, South Korea, Japan, Russia and the US might be gearing up for a six-way tug-of-war competition.
Jason Lee has a doctorate in international politics from National Chung Hsing University.
Translated by Edward Jones
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS