In the past 30 years, globalization has given way to an international division of labor, with developing countries focusing on export manufacturing, while developed countries in Europe and the US concentrate on internationalizing service industries to drive economic growth.
The competitive advantages of these countries can readily be seen in the global financial market. For example, Taiwan has attracted a lot of global interest with its technology industry. The US is the home of leading digital service companies, such as Meta Platforms (Facebook), Alphabet (Google) and Microsoft. The country holds a virtual oligopoly of the global market for consumer digital services and is the biggest winner of the network effect. Meanwhile, Germany, Japan and South Korea export not only manufacturing products, but also services, which serve as twin engines of economic growth.
Acer founder Stan Shih (施振榮) has time and again called on Taiwan to promote the internationalization of its service industry, believing that a thousand-fold more opportunities lie in the international market, as the service industry occupies a major role in the industrial structure of countries around the world and offers more value-added opportunities.
However, Shih has also said that internationalizing the service industry is 100 times harder than promoting export manufacturing, not only because service innovation is more difficult, but also because it requires more resources. This is what Taiwan needs to constantly review when promoting its digital New Southbound Policy.
Taiwan’s digital and software technology is catching up with hardware development. With machine vision, for example, optical technology would have been the focus under the previous approach when hardware development took precedence, but now with back-end artificial-intelligence machine learning, tasks can still be performed without having to frequently upgrade the hardware, enhancing cost competitiveness and creating added value for customers.
As such, there are three keys to promoting the digital New Southbound Policy, based on the idea of internationalizing the service industry:
First, the application range of the nation’s software and digital technology should be broad enough, allowing more challenges to cultivate more experiences, and accumulating experiences from integrating software and hardware to reinforce its digital technology. This is the first step to establishing the “experience scale.”
Second, the gap in the quality scale of talent — professional and international marketing expertise — between Taiwan and Europe and the US must be narrowed. As most of the nation’s talent are employed in the technology industry, the government must accelerate the introduction of international talent, recruit more foreign students in the higher education system, and review medium and long-term immigration policies.
As for the market structure, policy tools can be used to encourage technology companies that have successfully completed their digital transformation to reorganize their digital talent into independent system integration companies and integrate them with new ventures or join international mergers and acquisitions or strategic alliances. Enriching digital service talent should facilitate international cooperation and competition with big US and European companies.
The third key is to optimize the internal management and remuneration system of Taiwanese enterprises with a high-standard capital “logistics scale” to address the international competition for talent.
The New Southbound Policy used to be limited to manufacturing, with a focus on reducing personnel costs. However, to promote the internationalization of the digital service industry in the New Southbound Policy, Taiwan needs to adopt international standards, offering competitive salaries and management models to attract local and foreign talent from advanced economies to meet knowledge-intensive operational needs, and lend support to the two aforementioned key success factors.
In terms of capital, integrating international capital markets and strategic investors, and introducing a more forward-looking corporate governance system are also required to create a supporting environment for Taiwan to promote the internationalization of services in the smart field.
Lin Chia-lung is ambassador-at-large for digital New Southbound Policy initiatives and a former minister of transportation and communications.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
When the towers of Wang Fuk Court turned into a seven-building inferno on Wednesday last week, killing 128 people, including a firefighter, Hong Kong officials promised investigations, pledged to review regulations and within hours issued a plan to replace bamboo scaffolding with steel. It sounded decisive. It was not. The gestures are about political optics, not accountability. The tragedy was not caused by bamboo or by outdated laws. Flame-retardant netting is already required. Under Hong Kong’s Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme — which requires buildings more than 30 years old to undergo inspection every decade and compulsory repairs — the framework for
In A phone call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Xi is reported to have stated that in his view, “Taiwan’s return to China” is to be considered an integral part of the post-World War II international order. Never mind that China under Xi has been trying to undermine the liberal post-war international order by setting up alternative organizations and schemes that are detrimental to freedom and democracy around the world. Its own repression of Tibet, Xinjiang and Hong Kong are vivid examples. The “return to China” is the biggest misnomer: Taiwan has never ever been part
President William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced a plan to invest an additional NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.8 billion) in military spending to procure advanced defense systems over the next eight years, and outlined two major plans and concrete steps to defend democratic Taiwan in the face of China’s intensifying threat. While Lai’s plans for boosting the country’s national security have been praised by many US lawmakers, former defense officials, academics and the American Institute in Taiwan, the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan, they were not equally welcomed by all Taiwanese, particularly among the opposition parties. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman